2024•Unpublished venueRequires access

9.6 The influence of age of first exposure to American football on concussion history and age of first concussion in NCAA football players

Jaclyn B. Caccese, Julianne D. Schmidt, Steven P. Broglio, Thomas W. McAllister, Michael McCrea, Paul F. Pasquina, Thomas A. Buckley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To examine the association between estimated age of first exposure to American football (AFE) and concussion history in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football players Design Cross-sectional, observational study Setting Participants were recruited from 30 colleges/universities as part of the NCAA-U.S. Department of Defense Grand Alliance: Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium. Participants There were 2341 freshmen football players (age=18±1 years) included in analyses, including 690 (29%) with a previous history of concussion. Assessment of Risk Factors AFE (mean±standard deviation: 9±3 years; range: 3–17 years; AFE<12 years, n=1881 [80%]) Outcome Measures Concussion history (i.e., yes vs. no; number of pre-collegiate concussions [0, n=1651(71%); 1, n=545(23%); 2, n=111(5%); 3, n=28(1%), 4+, n=6(1%)]; age of first concussion [AFC; mean±standard deviation, 15±3 years; range, 3–20 years]) Main Results AFE was not associated with concussion history (yes vs. no) whether analyzed continuously (p=0.341, odds ratio(OR)=0.99 [95% confidence interval(CI), 0.96–1.02]) or dichotomously at age 12 (p=0.076, OR [AFE<12 vs. AFE>12]=1.23 [95%CI, 0.98–1.55]). AFE was not associated with number of pre-collegiate concussions when analyzed continuously (p=0.140, incidence rate ratios(IRR)=0.98 [95%CI, 0.96–1.01]), but football players with AFE<12 had slightly greater risk of sustaining more concussions (p=0.010, AFE<12 IRR=1.13 [95%CI=1.03–1.23]. Younger AFE was associated with younger AFC when analyzed continuously (p=0.010, R2=0.010) and dichotomously at age 12 (p=0.030, AFE<12 Parameter Estimate=-0.28 [95%CI, -0.54 to -0.03]). Conclusions Younger AFE does not increase likelihood of sustaining a concussion by college; however, it may be associated with younger AFC. Future work should examine the effects of younger AFC on clinical outcomes. This abstract has been published in full manuscript format and has the following citation: BMJ Citation https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15438627.2021.1966008

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To examine the association between estimated age of first exposure to American football (AFE) and concussion history in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football players Design Cross-sectional, observational study Setting Participants were recruited from 30 colleges/universities as part of the NCAA-U.S. Department of Defense Grand Alliance: Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium. Participants There were 2341 freshmen football players (age=18±1 years) included in analyses, including 690 (29%) with a previous history of concussion. Assessment of Risk Factors AFE (mean±standard deviation: 9±3 years; range: 3–17 years; AFE<12 years, n=1881 [80%]) Outcome Measures Concussion history (i.e., yes vs. no; number of pre-collegiate concussions [0, n=1651(71%); 1, n=545(23%); 2, n=111(5%); 3, n=28(1%), 4+, n=6(1%)]; age of first concussion [AFC; mean±standard deviation, 15±3 years; range, 3–20 years]) Main Results AFE was not associated with concussion history (yes vs. no) whether analyzed continuously (p=0.341, odds ratio(OR)=0.99 [95% confidence interval(CI), 0.96–1.02]) or dichotomously at age 12 (p=0.076, OR [AFE<12 vs. AFE>12]=1.23 [95%CI, 0.98–1.55]). AFE was not associated with number of pre-collegiate concussions when analyzed continuously (p=0.140, incidence rate ratios(IRR)=0.98 [95%CI, 0.96–1.01]), but football players with AFE<12 had slightly greater risk of sustaining more concussions (p=0.010, AFE<12 IRR=1.13 [95%CI=1.03–1.23]. Younger AFE was associated with younger AFC when analyzed continuously (p=0.010, R2=0.010) and dichotomously at age 12 (p=0.030, AFE<12 Parameter Estimate=-0.28 [95%CI, -0.54 to -0.03]). Conclusions Younger AFE does not increase likelihood of sustaining a concussion by college; however, it may be associated with younger AFC. Future work should examine the effects of younger AFC on clinical outcomes. This abstract has been published in full manuscript format and has the following citation: BMJ Citation https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15438627.2021.1966008

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To examine the association between estimated age of first exposure to American football (AFE) and concussion history in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football players Design Cross-sectional, observational study Setting Participants were recruited from 30 colleges/universities as part of the NCAA-U.S. Department of Defense Grand Alliance: Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium. Participants There were 2341 freshmen football players (age=18±1 years) included in analyses, including 690 (29%) with a previous history of concussion. Assessment of Risk Factors AFE (mean±standard deviation: 9±3 years; range: 3–17 years; AFE<12 years, n=1881 [80%]) Outcome Measures Concussion history (i.e., yes vs. no; number of pre-collegiate concussions [0, n=1651(71%); 1, n=545(23%); 2, n=111(5%); 3, n=28(1%), 4+, n=6(1%)]; age of first concussion [AFC; mean±standard deviation, 15±3 years; range, 3–20 years]) Main Results AFE was not associated with concussion history (yes vs. no) whether analyzed continuously (p=0.341, odds ratio(OR)=0.99 [95% confidence interval(CI), 0.96–1.02]) or dichotomously at age 12 (p=0.076, OR [AFE<12 vs. AFE>12]=1.23 [95%CI, 0.98–1.55]). AFE was not associated with number of pre-collegiate concussions when analyzed continuously (p=0.140, incidence rate ratios(IRR)=0.98 [95%CI, 0.96–1.01]), but football players with AFE<12 had slightly greater risk of sustaining more concussions (p=0.010, AFE<12 IRR=1.13 [95%CI=1.03–1.23]. Younger AFE was associated with younger AFC when analyzed continuously (p=0.010, R2=0.010) and dichotomously at age 12 (p=0.030, AFE<12 Parameter Estimate=-0.28 [95%CI, -0.54 to -0.03]). Conclusions Younger AFE does not increase likelihood of sustaining a concussion by college; however, it may be associated with younger AFC. Future work should examine the effects of younger AFC on clinical outcomes. This abstract has been published in full manuscript format and has the following citation: BMJ Citation https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15438627.2021.1966008

Key concepts: Concussion, Football, Medicine, Odds ratio, Confidence interval, Physical therapy, Psychology, Demography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
9.6 The influence of age of first exposure to American football on concussion history and age of first concussion in NCAA football players — Research Paper | ScholarLens