2023International Journal of Linguistics Literature & TranslationOpen access

Finding the Right Fit: Instructor Perspectives on Using Direct, Indirect, and Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback for L2 Writing Development in Kuwait University

Bashayer Jassim Al Bloushi, Lulwa Jassim Al-Bloushi

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This study explains what Direct, Indirect, and Metalinguistic corrective feedback techniques are and how they differ. Furthermore, the research elaborates on the perception of the language instructors on the effects of the corrective techniques on L2 students. In this study, the researcher refers to her teaching context at Kuwait University, clarifying how the chosen corrective feedback affects the students and which corrective technique is suitable. The study exhibits the effects on the students receiving feedback papers and how the corrective technique helped them reduce errors. The researcher further explains how the students learn from their feedback and which works best for them as corrective feedback. It also explicitly explains and clarifies what other teachers with similar studies found out when providing different kinds of feedback to their students.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study explains what Direct, Indirect, and Metalinguistic corrective feedback techniques are and how they differ. Furthermore, the research elaborates on the perception of the language instructors on the effects of the corrective techniques on L2 students. In this study, the researcher refers to her teaching context at Kuwait University, clarifying how the chosen corrective feedback affects the students and which corrective technique is suitable. The study exhibits the effects on the students receiving feedback papers and how the corrective technique helped them reduce errors. The researcher further explains how the students learn from their feedback and which works best for them as corrective feedback. It also explicitly explains and clarifies what other teachers with similar studies found out when providing different kinds of feedback to their students.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study explains what Direct, Indirect, and Metalinguistic corrective feedback techniques are and how they differ. Furthermore, the research elaborates on the perception of the language instructors on the effects of the corrective techniques on L2 students. In this study, the researcher refers to her teaching context at Kuwait University, clarifying how the chosen corrective feedback affects the students and which corrective technique is suitable. The study exhibits the effects on the students receiving feedback papers and how the corrective technique helped them reduce errors. The researcher further explains how the students learn from their feedback and which works best for them as corrective feedback. It also explicitly explains and clarifies what other teachers with similar studies found out when providing different kinds of feedback to their students.

Key concepts: Corrective feedback, Context (archaeology), Perception, Psychology, Mathematics education, Computer science, Biology, Neuroscience

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Finding the Right Fit: Instructor Perspectives on Using Direct, Indirect, and Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback for L2 Writing Development in Kuwait University — Research Paper | ScholarLens