2023Unpublished venueRequires access

A Tale of Transplantation

Siyi Lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract This chapter embarks on a journey through time to examine the origins and historical evolution of unjust enrichment in China and aims to find answers from the history explaining the existing complexities of this area of law. It shows that the notion against enrichment without justification has been in Chinese law since the times of ancient China. However, instead of being an indigenous part of the law, the modern concept of unjust enrichment was transplanted into China for the first time when the Qing dynasty drafted the Chinese Civil Code in 1911 by referring to the German Civil Code. Compared to other branches of civil law, the Chinese law of unjust enrichment was out of the spotlight for many years. There were very few rules concerning unjust enrichment before the promulgation of the Chinese Civil Code in 2020 and the specifics of even the very fundamental aspects of the current Chinese law of unjust enrichment are not free from controversy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This chapter embarks on a journey through time to examine the origins and historical evolution of unjust enrichment in China and aims to find answers from the history explaining the existing complexities of this area of law. It shows that the notion against enrichment without justification has been in Chinese law since the times of ancient China. However, instead of being an indigenous part of the law, the modern concept of unjust enrichment was transplanted into China for the first time when the Qing dynasty drafted the Chinese Civil Code in 1911 by referring to the German Civil Code. Compared to other branches of civil law, the Chinese law of unjust enrichment was out of the spotlight for many years. There were very few rules concerning unjust enrichment before the promulgation of the Chinese Civil Code in 2020 and the specifics of even the very fundamental aspects of the current Chinese law of unjust enrichment are not free from controversy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This chapter embarks on a journey through time to examine the origins and historical evolution of unjust enrichment in China and aims to find answers from the history explaining the existing complexities of this area of law. It shows that the notion against enrichment without justification has been in Chinese law since the times of ancient China. However, instead of being an indigenous part of the law, the modern concept of unjust enrichment was transplanted into China for the first time when the Qing dynasty drafted the Chinese Civil Code in 1911 by referring to the German Civil Code. Compared to other branches of civil law, the Chinese law of unjust enrichment was out of the spotlight for many years. There were very few rules concerning unjust enrichment before the promulgation of the Chinese Civil Code in 2020 and the specifics of even the very fundamental aspects of the current Chinese law of unjust enrichment are not free from controversy.

Key concepts: Unjust enrichment, Promulgation, Civil code, China, Law, Civil law (Civil law), Indigenous, Chinese law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Tale of Transplantation — Research Paper | ScholarLens