2023WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERYOpen access

Comparison of the Results of Delayed Repair of Flexor Pollicis Longus (FPL) Tendon with Tendon Transfer or with Tendon Graft

Yousef Shafaei, Mehdi Tassallibakhsh, Mohamadreza Akhoondinasab, Noorahmad Latifi

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Background: In Flexor Pollicis Longus (FPL) injuries, primary repair with end-to-end suture is the treatment of choice.In cases where primary repair is not possible, tendon transfer or tendon grafting is used, each of which has its strengths and weaknesses.We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of each of the above two methods in patients.Methods: Patients with FPL injury who referred to Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran late in 2020 to 2021, if primary tendon repair was not possible, were randomly repaired with tendon transfer or tendon graft.After the appropriate time, the splint was opened and physiotherapy was performed for the patients.Then, at least three months after the repair, the range of motion of the IP and MP joints of the patients thumb was measured and compared in two groups.Results: Ten patients in the tendon transfer group and 10 patients in the tendon graft group were studied.In the secondary repair of FPL with tendon grafting, the range of motion of both IP and MP joints of the thumb was not significantly different compared to repair with tendon transfer.Conclusion: The findings of this research confirm controversies in this field.In order to obtain more accurate results, it is suggested to carry out a research with a larger number of patients and with strict control over the surgical technique and post-operative care, as well as taking into account the morbidities caused by donor tendon removal and examining the overall satisfaction of the patients.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: In Flexor Pollicis Longus (FPL) injuries, primary repair with end-to-end suture is the treatment of choice.In cases where primary repair is not possible, tendon transfer or tendon grafting is used, each of which has its strengths and weaknesses.We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of each of the above two methods in patients.Methods: Patients with FPL injury who referred to Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran late in 2020 to 2021, if primary tendon repair was not possible, were randomly repaired with tendon transfer or tendon graft.After the appropriate time, the splint was opened and physiotherapy was performed for the patients.Then, at least three months after the repair, the range of motion of the IP and MP joints of the patients thumb was measured and compared in two groups.Results: Ten patients in the tendon transfer group and 10 patients in the tendon graft group were studied.In the secondary repair of FPL with tendon grafting, the range of motion of both IP and MP joints of the thumb was not significantly different compared to repair with tendon transfer.Conclusion: The findings of this research confirm controversies in this field.In order to obtain more accurate results, it is suggested to carry out a research with a larger number of patients and with strict control over the surgical technique and post-operative care, as well as taking into account the morbidities caused by donor tendon removal and examining the overall satisfaction of the patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: In Flexor Pollicis Longus (FPL) injuries, primary repair with end-to-end suture is the treatment of choice.In cases where primary repair is not possible, tendon transfer or tendon grafting is used, each of which has its strengths and weaknesses.We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of each of the above two methods in patients.Methods: Patients with FPL injury who referred to Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran late in 2020 to 2021, if primary tendon repair was not possible, were randomly repaired with tendon transfer or tendon graft.After the appropriate time, the splint was opened and physiotherapy was performed for the patients.Then, at least three months after the repair, the range of motion of the IP and MP joints of the patients thumb was measured and compared in two groups.Results: Ten patients in the tendon transfer group and 10 patients in the tendon graft group were studied.In the secondary repair of FPL with tendon grafting, the range of motion of both IP and MP joints of the thumb was not significantly different compared to repair with tendon transfer.Conclusion: The findings of this research confirm controversies in this field.In order to obtain more accurate results, it is suggested to carry out a research with a larger number of patients and with strict control over the surgical technique and post-operative care, as well as taking into account the morbidities caused by donor tendon removal and examining the overall satisfaction of the patients.

Key concepts: Tendon, Tendon transfer, Medicine, Anatomy, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Results of Delayed Repair of Flexor Pollicis Longus (FPL) Tendon with Tendon Transfer or with Tendon Graft — Research Paper | ScholarLens