2023Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental StatisticsOpen access

Spatial Confounding and Spatial+ for Nonlinear Covariate Effects

Emiko Dupont, Nicole H. Augustin

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Regression models for spatially varying data use spatial random effects to reflect spatial correlation structure. Such random effects, however, may interfere with the covariate effect estimates and make them unreliable. This problem, known as spatial confounding, is complex and has only been studied for models with linear covariate effects. However, as illustrated by a forestry example in which we assess the effect of soil, climate, and topography variables on tree health, the covariate effects of interest are in practice often unknown and nonlinear. We consider, for the first time, spatial confounding in spatial models with nonlinear effects implemented in the generalised additive models (GAMs) framework. We show that spatial+, a recently developed method for alleviating confounding in the linear case, can be adapted to this setting. In practice, spatial+ can then be used both as a diagnostic tool for investigating whether covariate effect estimates are affected by spatial confounding and for correcting the estimates for the resulting bias when it is present. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Regression models for spatially varying data use spatial random effects to reflect spatial correlation structure. Such random effects, however, may interfere with the covariate effect estimates and make them unreliable. This problem, known as spatial confounding, is complex and has only been studied for models with linear covariate effects. However, as illustrated by a forestry example in which we assess the effect of soil, climate, and topography variables on tree health, the covariate effects of interest are in practice often unknown and nonlinear. We consider, for the first time, spatial confounding in spatial models with nonlinear effects implemented in the generalised additive models (GAMs) framework. We show that spatial+, a recently developed method for alleviating confounding in the linear case, can be adapted to this setting. In practice, spatial+ can then be used both as a diagnostic tool for investigating whether covariate effect estimates are affected by spatial confounding and for correcting the estimates for the resulting bias when it is present. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Regression models for spatially varying data use spatial random effects to reflect spatial correlation structure. Such random effects, however, may interfere with the covariate effect estimates and make them unreliable. This problem, known as spatial confounding, is complex and has only been studied for models with linear covariate effects. However, as illustrated by a forestry example in which we assess the effect of soil, climate, and topography variables on tree health, the covariate effects of interest are in practice often unknown and nonlinear. We consider, for the first time, spatial confounding in spatial models with nonlinear effects implemented in the generalised additive models (GAMs) framework. We show that spatial+, a recently developed method for alleviating confounding in the linear case, can be adapted to this setting. In practice, spatial+ can then be used both as a diagnostic tool for investigating whether covariate effect estimates are affected by spatial confounding and for correcting the estimates for the resulting bias when it is present. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Key concepts: Covariate, Confounding, Statistics, Econometrics, Spatial analysis, Spatial dependence, Random effects model, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spatial Confounding and Spatial+ for Nonlinear Covariate Effects — Research Paper | ScholarLens