2023Geosynthetics InternationalRequires access

Extrapolating residual GMX/GDC interface strength from direct shear tests

Jiale Lin, Timothy D. Stark, Abedalqader Idries

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Residual interface strength is mobilized along sideslopes of geosynthetic lined areas, such as landfill sideslope. Unfortunately, only the large displacement (LD) interface strength is measured in frequently used direct shear tests, which overpredicts the residual interface strength by about 40% because of limited continuous shear displacement and new geomembrane being introduced during the test. Commercial laboratories usually conduct direct shear tests in accordance with ASTM D5321-02 or ASTM D6243-13, which can only measure the LD interface strength. This paper suggests a method to estimate the residual interface strength from direct shear test results, which provides a better estimate of field interface strengths. The shear stres–displacement relationship from ring shear tests fits a power function, which can be used to extrapolate direct shear test results to the residual strength. This paper shows the power function can predict reasonable residual interface strengths from the shear stress–displacement relationship measured in direct shear tests. This method allows estimation of the residual strength data when only direct shear test results are available and prevents overprediction of the factor of safety (FoS) during slope stability evaluations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Residual interface strength is mobilized along sideslopes of geosynthetic lined areas, such as landfill sideslope. Unfortunately, only the large displacement (LD) interface strength is measured in frequently used direct shear tests, which overpredicts the residual interface strength by about 40% because of limited continuous shear displacement and new geomembrane being introduced during the test. Commercial laboratories usually conduct direct shear tests in accordance with ASTM D5321-02 or ASTM D6243-13, which can only measure the LD interface strength. This paper suggests a method to estimate the residual interface strength from direct shear test results, which provides a better estimate of field interface strengths. The shear stres–displacement relationship from ring shear tests fits a power function, which can be used to extrapolate direct shear test results to the residual strength. This paper shows the power function can predict reasonable residual interface strengths from the shear stress–displacement relationship measured in direct shear tests. This method allows estimation of the residual strength data when only direct shear test results are available and prevents overprediction of the factor of safety (FoS) during slope stability evaluations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Residual interface strength is mobilized along sideslopes of geosynthetic lined areas, such as landfill sideslope. Unfortunately, only the large displacement (LD) interface strength is measured in frequently used direct shear tests, which overpredicts the residual interface strength by about 40% because of limited continuous shear displacement and new geomembrane being introduced during the test. Commercial laboratories usually conduct direct shear tests in accordance with ASTM D5321-02 or ASTM D6243-13, which can only measure the LD interface strength. This paper suggests a method to estimate the residual interface strength from direct shear test results, which provides a better estimate of field interface strengths. The shear stres–displacement relationship from ring shear tests fits a power function, which can be used to extrapolate direct shear test results to the residual strength. This paper shows the power function can predict reasonable residual interface strengths from the shear stress–displacement relationship measured in direct shear tests. This method allows estimation of the residual strength data when only direct shear test results are available and prevents overprediction of the factor of safety (FoS) during slope stability evaluations.

Key concepts: Direct shear test, Residual strength, Residual, Materials science, Shear (geology), Geosynthetics, Geotechnical engineering, Shear strength (soil)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Extrapolating residual GMX/GDC interface strength from direct shear tests — Research Paper | ScholarLens