1998Unpublished venueRequires access

Terminology, introduction, diagnostic criteria, and overview

Andrei Călin

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract A debate continues as to what name should be given to the spondylarthritides. We find no compelling reason to change from the title of our initial text (Calin 1984) and so continue to favour the use of spondylarthropathies or the spondylarthritides. We accept that Fran9ois and colleagues (1995) have made some suggestions towards a new glossary for the rheumatic spinal diseases. They base this on pathology and appear to favour the term ‘spondyloarthropathy’ originally proposed by Moll and Wright in 1974. However, as pointed out by Braun and Sieper (1996), spondylarthropathy and spondarthritis, and even spondyloarthropathy, have all been used interchangeably to describe the heterogeneous group of diseases that have a number of features in common.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A debate continues as to what name should be given to the spondylarthritides. We find no compelling reason to change from the title of our initial text (Calin 1984) and so continue to favour the use of spondylarthropathies or the spondylarthritides. We accept that Fran9ois and colleagues (1995) have made some suggestions towards a new glossary for the rheumatic spinal diseases. They base this on pathology and appear to favour the term ‘spondyloarthropathy’ originally proposed by Moll and Wright in 1974. However, as pointed out by Braun and Sieper (1996), spondylarthropathy and spondarthritis, and even spondyloarthropathy, have all been used interchangeably to describe the heterogeneous group of diseases that have a number of features in common.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A debate continues as to what name should be given to the spondylarthritides. We find no compelling reason to change from the title of our initial text (Calin 1984) and so continue to favour the use of spondylarthropathies or the spondylarthritides. We accept that Fran9ois and colleagues (1995) have made some suggestions towards a new glossary for the rheumatic spinal diseases. They base this on pathology and appear to favour the term ‘spondyloarthropathy’ originally proposed by Moll and Wright in 1974. However, as pointed out by Braun and Sieper (1996), spondylarthropathy and spondarthritis, and even spondyloarthropathy, have all been used interchangeably to describe the heterogeneous group of diseases that have a number of features in common.

Key concepts: Spondyloarthropathy, Spondylarthropathies, Glossary, Terminology, Medicine, Wright, Linguistics, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Terminology, introduction, diagnostic criteria, and overview — Research Paper | ScholarLens