2005Family PsychologyRequires access

A Science of Couple Therapy: For What Should We Seek Empirical Support?

Andrew Christensen, Brian D. Doss, David C. Atkins

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Abstract As scientist-practitioners, we want our clinical efforts to be supported by scientific evidence. Indeed, science can provide the most compelling evidence that our treatments are beneficial to our clients rather than ineffective or harmful for them. Not only does scientific evidence meet our own values and standards for the credibility of psychotherapeutic treatment, it provides accountability to our clients and to third-party payers, who increasingly want evidence that what they pay for is effective. Thus, the demand for scientific evidence is high, and many treatments and providers seek the mantle of scientific respectability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract As scientist-practitioners, we want our clinical efforts to be supported by scientific evidence. Indeed, science can provide the most compelling evidence that our treatments are beneficial to our clients rather than ineffective or harmful for them. Not only does scientific evidence meet our own values and standards for the credibility of psychotherapeutic treatment, it provides accountability to our clients and to third-party payers, who increasingly want evidence that what they pay for is effective. Thus, the demand for scientific evidence is high, and many treatments and providers seek the mantle of scientific respectability.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract As scientist-practitioners, we want our clinical efforts to be supported by scientific evidence. Indeed, science can provide the most compelling evidence that our treatments are beneficial to our clients rather than ineffective or harmful for them. Not only does scientific evidence meet our own values and standards for the credibility of psychotherapeutic treatment, it provides accountability to our clients and to third-party payers, who increasingly want evidence that what they pay for is effective. Thus, the demand for scientific evidence is high, and many treatments and providers seek the mantle of scientific respectability.

Key concepts: Credibility, Scientific evidence, Empirical evidence, Accountability, Psychology, Public relations, Engineering ethics, Psychotherapist

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Science of Couple Therapy: For What Should We Seek Empirical Support? — Research Paper | ScholarLens