Toposes Over A Base
Peter Johnstone
Abstract
Peter Johnstone
Abstract
Abstract We are interested in this chapter in studying the 2-category Top/S of toposes over a fixed topos S, through the medium of indexed category theory. We recall the precise definition of this 2-category from Section A4.1: its objects (which we call toposes defined over S, or simply S-toposes) are geometric morphisms p: E — S with codomain S, its morphisms (q: F — S) — (p: E — S) are pairs (f, a) where f: F — E is a geometric morphism and a : q = pf a geometric transformation, and its 2-cells (f, a) — (g, fi) are geometric transformations f — g compatible in the obvious sense with a and fi. However, we shall almost invariably abuse notation by suppressing any mention of the 2-isomorphism a when specifying 1-cells of Top/S; we shall also tend to suppress the structural morphism p when specifying objects of Top/S, and simply write ‘E is an S-topos’. (The justification for the latter abuse is contained in Theorem 3.1.2 below.)
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract We are interested in this chapter in studying the 2-category Top/S of toposes over a fixed topos S, through the medium of indexed category theory. We recall the precise definition of this 2-category from Section A4.1: its objects (which we call toposes defined over S, or simply S-toposes) are geometric morphisms p: E — S with codomain S, its morphisms (q: F — S) — (p: E — S) are pairs (f, a) where f: F — E is a geometric morphism and a : q = pf a geometric transformation, and its 2-cells (f, a) — (g, fi) are geometric transformations f — g compatible in the obvious sense with a and fi. However, we shall almost invariably abuse notation by suppressing any mention of the 2-isomorphism a when specifying 1-cells of Top/S; we shall also tend to suppress the structural morphism p when specifying objects of Top/S, and simply write ‘E is an S-topos’. (The justification for the latter abuse is contained in Theorem 3.1.2 below.)
Key concepts: Topos theory, Morphism, Mathematics, Section (typography), Base (topology), Isomorphism (crystallography), Notation, Base change