1998•Unpublished venueRequires access

Decompositions in Interior Point Algorithms

Yair Censor, Stavros A. Zenios

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract In 1984 N. Karmarkar of AT&T Bell Laboratories introduced an interior point algorithm for linear programming. The algorithm has a polynomial time complexity bound and has been established, following extensive computational experimentation, as a viable competitor to the classic simplex algorithm for the solution of large-scale linear programs. A flurry of re search activities followed Karmarkar’s work and several interior point algorithms were developed for linear programming, convex quadratic programming, convex programming, linear complementarity problems, and nonlinear complementarity problems. Different mathematical tools have been employed to develop and analyze these algorithms. Depending on the theory underlying the mathematical analysis the algorithms are classified as potential reduction algorithms, path following algorithms, barrier function algorithms, affine scaling algorithms, and projective scaling algorithms.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In 1984 N. Karmarkar of AT&T Bell Laboratories introduced an interior point algorithm for linear programming. The algorithm has a polynomial time complexity bound and has been established, following extensive computational experimentation, as a viable competitor to the classic simplex algorithm for the solution of large-scale linear programs. A flurry of re search activities followed Karmarkar’s work and several interior point algorithms were developed for linear programming, convex quadratic programming, convex programming, linear complementarity problems, and nonlinear complementarity problems. Different mathematical tools have been employed to develop and analyze these algorithms. Depending on the theory underlying the mathematical analysis the algorithms are classified as potential reduction algorithms, path following algorithms, barrier function algorithms, affine scaling algorithms, and projective scaling algorithms.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In 1984 N. Karmarkar of AT&T Bell Laboratories introduced an interior point algorithm for linear programming. The algorithm has a polynomial time complexity bound and has been established, following extensive computational experimentation, as a viable competitor to the classic simplex algorithm for the solution of large-scale linear programs. A flurry of re search activities followed Karmarkar’s work and several interior point algorithms were developed for linear programming, convex quadratic programming, convex programming, linear complementarity problems, and nonlinear complementarity problems. Different mathematical tools have been employed to develop and analyze these algorithms. Depending on the theory underlying the mathematical analysis the algorithms are classified as potential reduction algorithms, path following algorithms, barrier function algorithms, affine scaling algorithms, and projective scaling algorithms.

Key concepts: Interior point method, Criss-cross algorithm, Simplex algorithm, Linear programming, Linear complementarity problem, Algorithm, Mathematical optimization, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Decompositions in Interior Point Algorithms — Research Paper | ScholarLens