1992Unpublished venueRequires access

Supervenience, Composition, and Physicalism

David P. Charles

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

Abstract Physical reality is fundamental and all genuine mental states and properties are grounded in physical states and properties. The mental is dependent on the physical, but the physical is not dependent on the mental. In this way, the physical determines the mental. These ideas are a commonplace in a central contemporary tradition in the philosophy of mind. They express (at least part of) the ‘physicalist’ preference for the physical as (in some sense) more basic than the mental. For physicalists, the major difficulty has been to make this set of ideas precise without undermining their initial plausibility. In the recent past, philosophers beginning from this starting-point have been led to propose accounts of mental phenomena which have proved difficult to defend in detail. One such account is the type identity thesis of the mental and the physical; another is analytical functionalism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Physical reality is fundamental and all genuine mental states and properties are grounded in physical states and properties. The mental is dependent on the physical, but the physical is not dependent on the mental. In this way, the physical determines the mental. These ideas are a commonplace in a central contemporary tradition in the philosophy of mind. They express (at least part of) the ‘physicalist’ preference for the physical as (in some sense) more basic than the mental. For physicalists, the major difficulty has been to make this set of ideas precise without undermining their initial plausibility. In the recent past, philosophers beginning from this starting-point have been led to propose accounts of mental phenomena which have proved difficult to defend in detail. One such account is the type identity thesis of the mental and the physical; another is analytical functionalism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Physical reality is fundamental and all genuine mental states and properties are grounded in physical states and properties. The mental is dependent on the physical, but the physical is not dependent on the mental. In this way, the physical determines the mental. These ideas are a commonplace in a central contemporary tradition in the philosophy of mind. They express (at least part of) the ‘physicalist’ preference for the physical as (in some sense) more basic than the mental. For physicalists, the major difficulty has been to make this set of ideas precise without undermining their initial plausibility. In the recent past, philosophers beginning from this starting-point have been led to propose accounts of mental phenomena which have proved difficult to defend in detail. One such account is the type identity thesis of the mental and the physical; another is analytical functionalism.

Key concepts: Physicalism, Supervenience, Functionalism (philosophy of mind), Epistemology, Philosophy of mind, Identity (music), Metaphysics, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Supervenience, Composition, and Physicalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens