Relativism and Reliability
Kevin T. Kelly
Abstract
Kevin T. Kelly
Abstract
Abstract Neither principle implies the other. Correctness could change spontaneously through time in a way that the scientist cannot affect, and correctness could depend on what the scientist does in the limit without changing through time. The nonexperimental inductive setting considered in chapters 1 through 13 satisfies both axioms, since correctness is taken to be a fixed relation between data streams and hypotheses in that setting. Experimental investigation of structural hypotheses also satisfies both axioms, since structural relations in the system under study are not altered by the manipulation of variables. But there are circumstances in which both axioms can fail.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Neither principle implies the other. Correctness could change spontaneously through time in a way that the scientist cannot affect, and correctness could depend on what the scientist does in the limit without changing through time. The nonexperimental inductive setting considered in chapters 1 through 13 satisfies both axioms, since correctness is taken to be a fixed relation between data streams and hypotheses in that setting. Experimental investigation of structural hypotheses also satisfies both axioms, since structural relations in the system under study are not altered by the manipulation of variables. But there are circumstances in which both axioms can fail.
Key concepts: Correctness, Axiom, Axiomatic system, Relation (database), Reliability (semiconductor), Computer science, Mathematical economics, Limit (mathematics)