1996Unpublished venueRequires access

Relativism and Reliability

Kevin T. Kelly

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Neither principle implies the other. Correctness could change spontaneously through time in a way that the scientist cannot affect, and correctness could depend on what the scientist does in the limit without changing through time. The nonexperimental inductive setting considered in chapters 1 through 13 satisfies both axioms, since correctness is taken to be a fixed relation between data streams and hypotheses in that setting. Experimental investigation of structural hypotheses also satisfies both axioms, since structural relations in the system under study are not altered by the manipulation of variables. But there are circumstances in which both axioms can fail.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Neither principle implies the other. Correctness could change spontaneously through time in a way that the scientist cannot affect, and correctness could depend on what the scientist does in the limit without changing through time. The nonexperimental inductive setting considered in chapters 1 through 13 satisfies both axioms, since correctness is taken to be a fixed relation between data streams and hypotheses in that setting. Experimental investigation of structural hypotheses also satisfies both axioms, since structural relations in the system under study are not altered by the manipulation of variables. But there are circumstances in which both axioms can fail.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Neither principle implies the other. Correctness could change spontaneously through time in a way that the scientist cannot affect, and correctness could depend on what the scientist does in the limit without changing through time. The nonexperimental inductive setting considered in chapters 1 through 13 satisfies both axioms, since correctness is taken to be a fixed relation between data streams and hypotheses in that setting. Experimental investigation of structural hypotheses also satisfies both axioms, since structural relations in the system under study are not altered by the manipulation of variables. But there are circumstances in which both axioms can fail.

Key concepts: Correctness, Axiom, Axiomatic system, Relation (database), Reliability (semiconductor), Computer science, Mathematical economics, Limit (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relativism and Reliability — Research Paper | ScholarLens