1997•Unpublished venueRequires access

Practical Reason Divided: Aquinas and his Critics

TERENCE H. IRWIN

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

Abstract Early in his discussion of virtue of character, Aristotle takes it to be obvious that virtue is somehow connected with practical reason: ‘First, then, actions should express correct reason. That is a common [belief], and let us assume it; later we will say what correct reason is and how it is related to the other virtues’ (Nicomachean Ethics 1103b31-4). When he argues that virtue lies in a mean, he adds that the mean is ‘determined by reason, and by the reason by which the prudent person would determine it’ (1106b36-1107a2). To make his account of virtue not only true but perspicuous, he seeks an account of prudence (1138b18-34). At the end of his account of prudence, he claims to have answered the question about the nature of correct reason: ‘it is not merely the state expressing correct reason, but the state involving correct reason, that is virtue. And it is prudence that is correct reason in this area’ (1144b26-8).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Early in his discussion of virtue of character, Aristotle takes it to be obvious that virtue is somehow connected with practical reason: ‘First, then, actions should express correct reason. That is a common [belief], and let us assume it; later we will say what correct reason is and how it is related to the other virtues’ (Nicomachean Ethics 1103b31-4). When he argues that virtue lies in a mean, he adds that the mean is ‘determined by reason, and by the reason by which the prudent person would determine it’ (1106b36-1107a2). To make his account of virtue not only true but perspicuous, he seeks an account of prudence (1138b18-34). At the end of his account of prudence, he claims to have answered the question about the nature of correct reason: ‘it is not merely the state expressing correct reason, but the state involving correct reason, that is virtue. And it is prudence that is correct reason in this area’ (1144b26-8).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Early in his discussion of virtue of character, Aristotle takes it to be obvious that virtue is somehow connected with practical reason: ‘First, then, actions should express correct reason. That is a common [belief], and let us assume it; later we will say what correct reason is and how it is related to the other virtues’ (Nicomachean Ethics 1103b31-4). When he argues that virtue lies in a mean, he adds that the mean is ‘determined by reason, and by the reason by which the prudent person would determine it’ (1106b36-1107a2). To make his account of virtue not only true but perspicuous, he seeks an account of prudence (1138b18-34). At the end of his account of prudence, he claims to have answered the question about the nature of correct reason: ‘it is not merely the state expressing correct reason, but the state involving correct reason, that is virtue. And it is prudence that is correct reason in this area’ (1144b26-8).

Key concepts: Prudence, Virtue, Philosophy, Epistemology, Character (mathematics), State (computer science), Computer science, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Practical Reason Divided: Aquinas and his Critics — Research Paper | ScholarLens