228 Effect of Benzoic Acid Feeding Strategy on Weanling Pig Growth Performance
Katelyn N. Gaffield, Jason C Woodworth, Joel M DeRouchey, Mike D Tokach, Robert D Goodband, Jordan T Gebhardt
Abstract
Open-access reader
Katelyn N. Gaffield, Jason C Woodworth, Joel M DeRouchey, Mike D Tokach, Robert D Goodband, Jordan T Gebhardt
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract Weanling barrows (n = 350; Line 200 × 400, DNA, Columbus, NE; initially 5.9 ± 0.04 kg) were used in a 38-day study to evaluate the effects of different benzoic acid feeding strategies on nursery growth performance. Pigs were randomly assigned to pens (5 pigs per pen) and pens were allotted to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 14 pens per treatment. Dietary treatments were formulated to provide 0, 0.25, or 0.50% benzoic acid (VevoVitall, DSM Nutritional Products, Parsippany, NJ) at the expense of corn. Treatment 1 served as the control without benzoic acid throughout all three dietary phases. Treatment 2 included 0.50% benzoic acid throughout all three phases. Treatment 3 contained 0.50% benzoic acid for phase 1 and phase 2, and 0.25% benzoic acid in phase 3. Treatment 4 contained 0.50% benzoic acid for phase 1 and phase 2, but no benzoic acid in phase 3. Treatment 5 contained 0.50% benzoic acid in phase 1, 0.25% benzoic acid in phase 2, and no benzoic acid in phase 3. From d 0 to 10 (Phase 1), pigs fed 0.50% benzoic acid had increased (P < 0.05) ADG and G:F, and were heavier (P = 0.040) on d 10 than those fed the control diet (Table). From d 10 to 18 (Phase 2), pigs fed 0.50% benzoic acid had increased (P < 0.01) ADG compared with pigs fed either none or 0.25% benzoic acid, while pigs fed 0.25% benzoic acid had poorer (P < 0.001) feed efficiency compared with pigs fed none or 0.50% benzoic acid. From d 18 to 38 (Phase 3), pigs fed 0.50% and 0.25% benzoic acid had increased (P < 0.01) ADG and ADFI compared with pigs fed no benzoic acid. Overall, pigs fed 0.50% in the first two phases and 0.25% benzoic acid in the final phase had a greater (P < 0.05) ADG than pigs fed no benzoic acid through all three phases or pigs fed 0.50% in the first two phases and no benzoic acid in the final phase, with the other treatments intermediate. Additionally, pigs fed 0.50% in the first two phases and 0.25% benzoic acid in the final phase had improved (P < 0.05) G:F compared with pigs fed no benzoic acid throughout all three phases, pigs fed 0.50% in the first two phases and no benzoic acid in the third phase, or pigs fed 0.50%, 0.25%, and no benzoic acid. These data suggest that nursery pigs fed benzoic acid had improved growth performance. However, when the benzoic acid was removed from the diet before the end of the nursery phase, the pigs experienced a reduction in performance resulting in similar overall performance to the control diet without benzoic acid.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Weanling barrows (n = 350; Line 200 × 400, DNA, Columbus, NE; initially 5.9 ± 0.04 kg) were used in a 38-day study to evaluate the effects of different benzoic acid feeding strategies on nursery growth performance. Pigs were randomly assigned to pens (5 pigs per pen) and pens were allotted to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 14 pens per treatment. Dietary treatments were formulated to provide 0, 0.25, or 0.50% benzoic acid (VevoVitall, DSM Nutritional Products, Parsippany, NJ) at the expense of corn. Treatment 1 served as the control without benzoic acid throughout all three dietary phases. Treatment 2 included 0.50% benzoic acid throughout all three phases. Treatment 3 contained 0.50% benzoic acid for phase 1 and phase 2, and 0.25% benzoic acid in phase 3. Treatment 4 contained 0.50% benzoic acid for phase 1 and phase 2, but no benzoic acid in phase 3. Treatment 5 contained 0.50% benzoic acid in phase 1, 0.25% benzoic acid in phase 2, and no benzoic acid in phase 3. From d 0 to 10 (Phase 1), pigs fed 0.50% benzoic acid had increased (P < 0.05) ADG and G:F, and were heavier (P = 0.040) on d 10 than those fed the control diet (Table). From d 10 to 18 (Phase 2), pigs fed 0.50% benzoic acid had increased (P < 0.01) ADG compared with pigs fed either none or 0.25% benzoic acid, while pigs fed 0.25% benzoic acid had poorer (P < 0.001) feed efficiency compared with pigs fed none or 0.50% benzoic acid. From d 18 to 38 (Phase 3), pigs fed 0.50% and 0.25% benzoic acid had increased (P < 0.01) ADG and ADFI compared with pigs fed no benzoic acid. Overall, pigs fed 0.50% in the first two phases and 0.25% benzoic acid in the final phase had a greater (P < 0.05) ADG than pigs fed no benzoic acid through all three phases or pigs fed 0.50% in the first two phases and no benzoic acid in the final phase, with the other treatments intermediate. Additionally, pigs fed 0.50% in the first two phases and 0.25% benzoic acid in the final phase had improved (P < 0.05) G:F compared with pigs fed no benzoic acid throughout all three phases, pigs fed 0.50% in the first two phases and no benzoic acid in the third phase, or pigs fed 0.50%, 0.25%, and no benzoic acid. These data suggest that nursery pigs fed benzoic acid had improved growth performance. However, when the benzoic acid was removed from the diet before the end of the nursery phase, the pigs experienced a reduction in performance resulting in similar overall performance to the control diet without benzoic acid.
Key concepts: Benzoic acid, Weanling, Chemistry, Food science, Animal science, Biochemistry, Medicine, Biology