2009•Unpublished venueRequires access

Dealing with Risks of Outliving Resources in Retirement

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Possibly the greatest shift in the character of the employer-sponsored retirement plan system over the past quarter-century has been the movement away from plans that provide retirees with an annuity for life to plans that provide workers with a lump sum of cash the day they walk out the employer’s door for the last time—whether it be into retirement or on to the next job. Aside from the shift toward defined contribution plans—which generally only pay lump sums—a growing number of defined benefit plans provide lump sums as a benefit option, and in most hybrid plans, the lump sum is the primary benefit form. Where individuals have the option of a lump sum at retirement, they tend to choose the lump sum over the annuity. This chapter explores the reasons behind the shift from annuities to lump sums and the consequences.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Possibly the greatest shift in the character of the employer-sponsored retirement plan system over the past quarter-century has been the movement away from plans that provide retirees with an annuity for life to plans that provide workers with a lump sum of cash the day they walk out the employer’s door for the last time—whether it be into retirement or on to the next job. Aside from the shift toward defined contribution plans—which generally only pay lump sums—a growing number of defined benefit plans provide lump sums as a benefit option, and in most hybrid plans, the lump sum is the primary benefit form. Where individuals have the option of a lump sum at retirement, they tend to choose the lump sum over the annuity. This chapter explores the reasons behind the shift from annuities to lump sums and the consequences.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Possibly the greatest shift in the character of the employer-sponsored retirement plan system over the past quarter-century has been the movement away from plans that provide retirees with an annuity for life to plans that provide workers with a lump sum of cash the day they walk out the employer’s door for the last time—whether it be into retirement or on to the next job. Aside from the shift toward defined contribution plans—which generally only pay lump sums—a growing number of defined benefit plans provide lump sums as a benefit option, and in most hybrid plans, the lump sum is the primary benefit form. Where individuals have the option of a lump sum at retirement, they tend to choose the lump sum over the annuity. This chapter explores the reasons behind the shift from annuities to lump sums and the consequences.

Key concepts: Lump sum, Annuity, Aside, Life annuity, Cash, Actuarial science, Quarter (Canadian coin), Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dealing with Risks of Outliving Resources in Retirement — Research Paper | ScholarLens