1994Unpublished venueRequires access

An Intraorganizational Ecological Perspective on Managerial Risk Behavior, Performance, and Survival: Individual, Organizational, and Environmental Effects

Robert A. Burgelman, Brian S. Mittman

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Abstract During the last fifteen years, organization ecology has become a major paradigm in the study of organizations (e.g., Carroll, 1988; Hannan and Freeman, 1989). To date studies in organization ecology have been conducted primarily at the organization, population, and community levels of analysis, while phenomena within organizations have largely been ignored. This results, in part, from the fact that organizational ecology is premised on relative inertia of organizations, implying that change processes within organizations are largely irrelevant. A few studies have used the logic of organizational ecology to examine phenomena within organizations. For instance, Langton (l 984) has elucidated the evolution of the Wedgwood pottery firm in the United Kingdom; Miner (1990, 1991) has studied the role of idiosyncratic job development within organizations as a means of adaptation; and Burgelman (1991) has suggested an intraorganizational ecological perspective to explain the transformation of Intel Corporation from a memory company to a microcomputer company. These studies suggest that organizational ecology provides a powerful intellectual perspective which need not exclude the study of intraorganizational phenomena.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract During the last fifteen years, organization ecology has become a major paradigm in the study of organizations (e.g., Carroll, 1988; Hannan and Freeman, 1989). To date studies in organization ecology have been conducted primarily at the organization, population, and community levels of analysis, while phenomena within organizations have largely been ignored. This results, in part, from the fact that organizational ecology is premised on relative inertia of organizations, implying that change processes within organizations are largely irrelevant. A few studies have used the logic of organizational ecology to examine phenomena within organizations. For instance, Langton (l 984) has elucidated the evolution of the Wedgwood pottery firm in the United Kingdom; Miner (1990, 1991) has studied the role of idiosyncratic job development within organizations as a means of adaptation; and Burgelman (1991) has suggested an intraorganizational ecological perspective to explain the transformation of Intel Corporation from a memory company to a microcomputer company. These studies suggest that organizational ecology provides a powerful intellectual perspective which need not exclude the study of intraorganizational phenomena.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract During the last fifteen years, organization ecology has become a major paradigm in the study of organizations (e.g., Carroll, 1988; Hannan and Freeman, 1989). To date studies in organization ecology have been conducted primarily at the organization, population, and community levels of analysis, while phenomena within organizations have largely been ignored. This results, in part, from the fact that organizational ecology is premised on relative inertia of organizations, implying that change processes within organizations are largely irrelevant. A few studies have used the logic of organizational ecology to examine phenomena within organizations. For instance, Langton (l 984) has elucidated the evolution of the Wedgwood pottery firm in the United Kingdom; Miner (1990, 1991) has studied the role of idiosyncratic job development within organizations as a means of adaptation; and Burgelman (1991) has suggested an intraorganizational ecological perspective to explain the transformation of Intel Corporation from a memory company to a microcomputer company. These studies suggest that organizational ecology provides a powerful intellectual perspective which need not exclude the study of intraorganizational phenomena.

Key concepts: Organizational ecology, Perspective (graphical), Ecology, Corporation, Population ecology, Adaptation (eye), Population, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Intraorganizational Ecological Perspective on Managerial Risk Behavior, Performance, and Survival: Individual, Organizational, and Environmental Effects — Research Paper | ScholarLens