2023•Sustainable Food ProteinsOpen access

Consideration of utilizable amino acid content in the context of dietary protein quality assessment

Shiksha Adhikari, I.J.M. de Boer, Ollie van Hal, Thom Huppertz

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

Abstract Current evaluation systems for protein quality focus only on indispensable amino acids (IAAs) and do not consider the dispensable amino acids (DAAs). However, at excess levels of IAAs, DAAs may become limiting. Here, we used published ileal amino acid digestibility data determined in growing pigs and currently assumed protein and IAA recommendations to estimate utilizable, oxidized, and non‐absorbed amino acids in different dietary protein and to compare these utilizable amino acid values to digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) values. For dietary protein sources with a DIAAS value <90, the amount of calculated utilizable amino acids increased proportionally with the DIAAS value according to “utilizable amino acids (mg/g protein) = DIAAS × 10”; for dietary protein sources with a DIAAS value >90, the amount of utilizable amino acid stays within the range 800–1000 mg/g protein. Cereals contained the lowest levels of utilizable amino acids and the highest amount of oxidized amino acids. Dairy and meat have the highest amount of utilizable amino acids followed by nuts and pulses. For many mixtures of protein sources, the highest value for utilizable amino acids, which considers both IAAs and DAAs, occurred at a different ratio of protein sources than the maximum DIAAS value, which only considers IAAs. From this theoretical study and based on the assumptions made, we conclude that estimation of utilizable amino acids from data typically reported in DIAAS studies further enables complementary insights next to DIAAS values. Careful consideration of protein and IAA requirements is critical in further work.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Current evaluation systems for protein quality focus only on indispensable amino acids (IAAs) and do not consider the dispensable amino acids (DAAs). However, at excess levels of IAAs, DAAs may become limiting. Here, we used published ileal amino acid digestibility data determined in growing pigs and currently assumed protein and IAA recommendations to estimate utilizable, oxidized, and non‐absorbed amino acids in different dietary protein and to compare these utilizable amino acid values to digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) values. For dietary protein sources with a DIAAS value <90, the amount of calculated utilizable amino acids increased proportionally with the DIAAS value according to “utilizable amino acids (mg/g protein) = DIAAS × 10”; for dietary protein sources with a DIAAS value >90, the amount of utilizable amino acid stays within the range 800–1000 mg/g protein. Cereals contained the lowest levels of utilizable amino acids and the highest amount of oxidized amino acids. Dairy and meat have the highest amount of utilizable amino acids followed by nuts and pulses. For many mixtures of protein sources, the highest value for utilizable amino acids, which considers both IAAs and DAAs, occurred at a different ratio of protein sources than the maximum DIAAS value, which only considers IAAs. From this theoretical study and based on the assumptions made, we conclude that estimation of utilizable amino acids from data typically reported in DIAAS studies further enables complementary insights next to DIAAS values. Careful consideration of protein and IAA requirements is critical in further work.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Current evaluation systems for protein quality focus only on indispensable amino acids (IAAs) and do not consider the dispensable amino acids (DAAs). However, at excess levels of IAAs, DAAs may become limiting. Here, we used published ileal amino acid digestibility data determined in growing pigs and currently assumed protein and IAA recommendations to estimate utilizable, oxidized, and non‐absorbed amino acids in different dietary protein and to compare these utilizable amino acid values to digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) values. For dietary protein sources with a DIAAS value <90, the amount of calculated utilizable amino acids increased proportionally with the DIAAS value according to “utilizable amino acids (mg/g protein) = DIAAS × 10”; for dietary protein sources with a DIAAS value >90, the amount of utilizable amino acid stays within the range 800–1000 mg/g protein. Cereals contained the lowest levels of utilizable amino acids and the highest amount of oxidized amino acids. Dairy and meat have the highest amount of utilizable amino acids followed by nuts and pulses. For many mixtures of protein sources, the highest value for utilizable amino acids, which considers both IAAs and DAAs, occurred at a different ratio of protein sources than the maximum DIAAS value, which only considers IAAs. From this theoretical study and based on the assumptions made, we conclude that estimation of utilizable amino acids from data typically reported in DIAAS studies further enables complementary insights next to DIAAS values. Careful consideration of protein and IAA requirements is critical in further work.

Key concepts: Amino acid, Protein quality, Context (archaeology), Limiting, Complete protein, Essential amino acid, Biological value, Dietary protein

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Consideration of utilizable amino acid content in the context of dietary protein quality assessment — Research Paper | ScholarLens