1998•Unpublished venueRequires access

Life, The Universe and Everything: A Critique of Anthropocentric Rights

Catherine J. Redgwell

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

Abstract In Chapter 3 we saw that one critique of a human rights approach to environmental protection is its anthropocentricity; that a human right to a clean, healthy, or decent environment ignores the rights of animals and nature. There are two distinctive strands to such criticisms, broadly identified as deep ecology or environmentalism, and animal rights.4 Within each strand different motivations and philosophies are at work, ranging from a religious reverence for the preservation of all life to a more generalized repugnance towards anthropocentric justifications for environmental conservation. It is the purpose of this chapter to examine critiques of a human rights approach to environmental protection as ‘anthropocentric’ from the animal rights and environmentalist perspectives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In Chapter 3 we saw that one critique of a human rights approach to environmental protection is its anthropocentricity; that a human right to a clean, healthy, or decent environment ignores the rights of animals and nature. There are two distinctive strands to such criticisms, broadly identified as deep ecology or environmentalism, and animal rights.4 Within each strand different motivations and philosophies are at work, ranging from a religious reverence for the preservation of all life to a more generalized repugnance towards anthropocentric justifications for environmental conservation. It is the purpose of this chapter to examine critiques of a human rights approach to environmental protection as ‘anthropocentric’ from the animal rights and environmentalist perspectives.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In Chapter 3 we saw that one critique of a human rights approach to environmental protection is its anthropocentricity; that a human right to a clean, healthy, or decent environment ignores the rights of animals and nature. There are two distinctive strands to such criticisms, broadly identified as deep ecology or environmentalism, and animal rights.4 Within each strand different motivations and philosophies are at work, ranging from a religious reverence for the preservation of all life to a more generalized repugnance towards anthropocentric justifications for environmental conservation. It is the purpose of this chapter to examine critiques of a human rights approach to environmental protection as ‘anthropocentric’ from the animal rights and environmentalist perspectives.

Key concepts: Anthropocentrism, Environmentalism, Reverence, Animal rights, Environmental ethics, Human rights, Rights of Nature, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Life, The Universe and Everything: A Critique of Anthropocentric Rights — Research Paper | ScholarLens