2023HorticulturaeOpen access

Prescriptive-Corrective Irrigation and Macronutrient Management in Greenhouse Soil-Grown Tomato Using the VegSyst-DSS v2 Decision Support Tool

M. Gallardo, M. Teresa Peña-Fleitas, Francisco M. Padilla, Juan Cedeño, R.B. Thompson

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

This work relates to greenhouse vegetable production in soil in Almeria, Spain. The prescriptive–corrective management (PCM) of irrigation and fertilization (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) was evaluated. PCM combined recommendations (prescriptive management) for irrigation and nutrients made with the VegSyst-DSS v2, a decision support system, with monitoring (corrective management) using tensiometers (for irrigation) and petiole sap analysis (for nutrients). PCM was compared with conventional farmer management (CONV). The VegSyst-DSS v2 recommends applied nutrient concentrations considering simulated crop uptake, available soil nutrient supply, and evapotranspiration (ETc). This study was conducted with soil-grown tomato in a plastic greenhouse. Nutrients were applied in nutrient solution via drip fertigation. Compared to CONV management, PCM reduced irrigation by 25%, N, K, and Mg application by 40%, Ca by 58%, and P by 85%. There were no significant differences between treatments in fruit production and quality, despite appreciable reductions in irrigation and nutrient application. An economic analysis indicated that in this 7-month tomato crop, PCM compared to CONV management was associated with a financial saving of 1611 € ha−1. These results showed that by using prescriptive–corrective fertigation management, based on the VegSyst-DSS v2, considerable savings can be achieved in water and nutrient (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) inputs to greenhouse tomato without compromising production. This can reduce farmer costs and the environmental impact associated with these greenhouse production systems.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This work relates to greenhouse vegetable production in soil in Almeria, Spain. The prescriptive–corrective management (PCM) of irrigation and fertilization (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) was evaluated. PCM combined recommendations (prescriptive management) for irrigation and nutrients made with the VegSyst-DSS v2, a decision support system, with monitoring (corrective management) using tensiometers (for irrigation) and petiole sap analysis (for nutrients). PCM was compared with conventional farmer management (CONV). The VegSyst-DSS v2 recommends applied nutrient concentrations considering simulated crop uptake, available soil nutrient supply, and evapotranspiration (ETc). This study was conducted with soil-grown tomato in a plastic greenhouse. Nutrients were applied in nutrient solution via drip fertigation. Compared to CONV management, PCM reduced irrigation by 25%, N, K, and Mg application by 40%, Ca by 58%, and P by 85%. There were no significant differences between treatments in fruit production and quality, despite appreciable reductions in irrigation and nutrient application. An economic analysis indicated that in this 7-month tomato crop, PCM compared to CONV management was associated with a financial saving of 1611 € ha−1. These results showed that by using prescriptive–corrective fertigation management, based on the VegSyst-DSS v2, considerable savings can be achieved in water and nutrient (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) inputs to greenhouse tomato without compromising production. This can reduce farmer costs and the environmental impact associated with these greenhouse production systems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This work relates to greenhouse vegetable production in soil in Almeria, Spain. The prescriptive–corrective management (PCM) of irrigation and fertilization (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) was evaluated. PCM combined recommendations (prescriptive management) for irrigation and nutrients made with the VegSyst-DSS v2, a decision support system, with monitoring (corrective management) using tensiometers (for irrigation) and petiole sap analysis (for nutrients). PCM was compared with conventional farmer management (CONV). The VegSyst-DSS v2 recommends applied nutrient concentrations considering simulated crop uptake, available soil nutrient supply, and evapotranspiration (ETc). This study was conducted with soil-grown tomato in a plastic greenhouse. Nutrients were applied in nutrient solution via drip fertigation. Compared to CONV management, PCM reduced irrigation by 25%, N, K, and Mg application by 40%, Ca by 58%, and P by 85%. There were no significant differences between treatments in fruit production and quality, despite appreciable reductions in irrigation and nutrient application. An economic analysis indicated that in this 7-month tomato crop, PCM compared to CONV management was associated with a financial saving of 1611 € ha−1. These results showed that by using prescriptive–corrective fertigation management, based on the VegSyst-DSS v2, considerable savings can be achieved in water and nutrient (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) inputs to greenhouse tomato without compromising production. This can reduce farmer costs and the environmental impact associated with these greenhouse production systems.

Key concepts: Fertigation, Greenhouse, Nutrient management, Environmental science, Irrigation, Nutrient, Agronomy, Irrigation management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prescriptive-Corrective Irrigation and Macronutrient Management in Greenhouse Soil-Grown Tomato Using the VegSyst-DSS v2 Decision Support Tool — Research Paper | ScholarLens