2023•OSMANGAZİ JOURNAL OF MEDICINEOpen access

Real-Life Data on the Use of Omalizumab in Patients with Severe Asthma and Chronic Urticaria and Mepolizumab in Patients with Severe Asthma: A Retrospective Study

Pamir Çerçi, Tuba Erdoğan

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the real-life effectiveness of omalizumab and mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), explicitly examining changes in IgE levels and eosinophil counts during treatment. This retrospective study involved patients with severe asthma or CSU treated with biologic agents, including omalizumab and mepolizumab. The primary outcome measures were serum IgE levels, eosinophil counts, urticaria activity scores (UAS), and asthma control test scores (ACT). We studied 61 patients with severe asthma or chronic urticaria treated with biological agents. Patients with asthma exhibited a significant reduction in the median annual attack rate from 4 to 0 with omalizumab (p<0.001) and from 6 to 1 with mepolizumab (p<0.001). Eosinophil counts, and ACT scores significantly decreased with mepolizumab (p<0.001). Six patients who transitioned from omalizumab to mepolizumab did not experience severe asthma attacks in the first six months following the treatment switch. Patients with CSU showed a significant response to omalizumab (p<0.001). We observed significant improvements in various markers, including total IgE levels, eosinophil counts, UAS, and ACT scores, indicating that these treatments can effectively manage the symptoms of both conditions. These findings underscore the potential benefits of using these treatments as effective therapeutic options.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study aimed to assess the real-life effectiveness of omalizumab and mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), explicitly examining changes in IgE levels and eosinophil counts during treatment. This retrospective study involved patients with severe asthma or CSU treated with biologic agents, including omalizumab and mepolizumab. The primary outcome measures were serum IgE levels, eosinophil counts, urticaria activity scores (UAS), and asthma control test scores (ACT). We studied 61 patients with severe asthma or chronic urticaria treated with biological agents. Patients with asthma exhibited a significant reduction in the median annual attack rate from 4 to 0 with omalizumab (p<0.001) and from 6 to 1 with mepolizumab (p<0.001). Eosinophil counts, and ACT scores significantly decreased with mepolizumab (p<0.001). Six patients who transitioned from omalizumab to mepolizumab did not experience severe asthma attacks in the first six months following the treatment switch. Patients with CSU showed a significant response to omalizumab (p<0.001). We observed significant improvements in various markers, including total IgE levels, eosinophil counts, UAS, and ACT scores, indicating that these treatments can effectively manage the symptoms of both conditions. These findings underscore the potential benefits of using these treatments as effective therapeutic options.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study aimed to assess the real-life effectiveness of omalizumab and mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), explicitly examining changes in IgE levels and eosinophil counts during treatment. This retrospective study involved patients with severe asthma or CSU treated with biologic agents, including omalizumab and mepolizumab. The primary outcome measures were serum IgE levels, eosinophil counts, urticaria activity scores (UAS), and asthma control test scores (ACT). We studied 61 patients with severe asthma or chronic urticaria treated with biological agents. Patients with asthma exhibited a significant reduction in the median annual attack rate from 4 to 0 with omalizumab (p<0.001) and from 6 to 1 with mepolizumab (p<0.001). Eosinophil counts, and ACT scores significantly decreased with mepolizumab (p<0.001). Six patients who transitioned from omalizumab to mepolizumab did not experience severe asthma attacks in the first six months following the treatment switch. Patients with CSU showed a significant response to omalizumab (p<0.001). We observed significant improvements in various markers, including total IgE levels, eosinophil counts, UAS, and ACT scores, indicating that these treatments can effectively manage the symptoms of both conditions. These findings underscore the potential benefits of using these treatments as effective therapeutic options.

Key concepts: Omalizumab, Mepolizumab, Medicine, Asthma, Eosinophil, Immunoglobulin E, Retrospective cohort study, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Real-Life Data on the Use of Omalizumab in Patients with Severe Asthma and Chronic Urticaria and Mepolizumab in Patients with Severe Asthma: A Retrospective Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens