Estimation of the water footprint in the production of beef from Euro-pean cattle in Mexico
Andrea Trujillo Nava, Ramón Valdivia Alcalá, Juan Hernández Ortíz, Marco Andrés López Santiago
Abstract
Open-access reader
Andrea Trujillo Nava, Ramón Valdivia Alcalá, Juan Hernández Ortíz, Marco Andrés López Santiago
Abstract
Open-access reader
Objective: To determine the water footprint of beef from Charolais cattle subjected to stable production and an established diet. Design/Methodology/Approach: The water footprint was estimated using the methodology proposed by Hoekstra, in which the water footprints of the ingredients of the feed consumed are added to the total volume of water that the animal drank during its life. Results: The estimated water footprint for beef in this research was 2,972.4 liters per kg, including the blue and green water footprint. Study Limitations/Implications: The calculation of the gray water footprint is not included, although it is an indicator of the specific zone. Findings/Conclusions: There is a difference between the water footprint obtained in this study and the footprint reported in the references, perhaps as a result, among other reasons, of the differences in diet and breed of the animals studied.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To determine the water footprint of beef from Charolais cattle subjected to stable production and an established diet. Design/Methodology/Approach: The water footprint was estimated using the methodology proposed by Hoekstra, in which the water footprints of the ingredients of the feed consumed are added to the total volume of water that the animal drank during its life. Results: The estimated water footprint for beef in this research was 2,972.4 liters per kg, including the blue and green water footprint. Study Limitations/Implications: The calculation of the gray water footprint is not included, although it is an indicator of the specific zone. Findings/Conclusions: There is a difference between the water footprint obtained in this study and the footprint reported in the references, perhaps as a result, among other reasons, of the differences in diet and breed of the animals studied.
Key concepts: Footprint, Water use, Beef cattle, Environmental science, Ecological footprint, Production (economics), Breed, Animal science