2023Unpublished venueRequires access

The Source of Logical Necessity

Jessica Leech

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract This chapter presents an account of the source of logical necessity. An account according to which logical laws, and hence logical modality, have their source in thought, more particularly, in constitutive norms for thought, is introduced and defended. Constitutive norms for thought, it is explained, are norms evaluability in light of which is constitutive of thought. A test is introduced which, it is contended, all accounts of logical modality should pass. In short, any account of logical necessity must account for two important features: logical necessity is factive (if it is logically necessary that p, then p ); and some logical necessities are immune to rational doubt. It is argued that the proposed account of the source of logical modality passes the test, and that some rival accounts fail.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This chapter presents an account of the source of logical necessity. An account according to which logical laws, and hence logical modality, have their source in thought, more particularly, in constitutive norms for thought, is introduced and defended. Constitutive norms for thought, it is explained, are norms evaluability in light of which is constitutive of thought. A test is introduced which, it is contended, all accounts of logical modality should pass. In short, any account of logical necessity must account for two important features: logical necessity is factive (if it is logically necessary that p, then p ); and some logical necessities are immune to rational doubt. It is argued that the proposed account of the source of logical modality passes the test, and that some rival accounts fail.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This chapter presents an account of the source of logical necessity. An account according to which logical laws, and hence logical modality, have their source in thought, more particularly, in constitutive norms for thought, is introduced and defended. Constitutive norms for thought, it is explained, are norms evaluability in light of which is constitutive of thought. A test is introduced which, it is contended, all accounts of logical modality should pass. In short, any account of logical necessity must account for two important features: logical necessity is factive (if it is logically necessary that p, then p ); and some logical necessities are immune to rational doubt. It is argued that the proposed account of the source of logical modality passes the test, and that some rival accounts fail.

Key concepts: Modality (human–computer interaction), Logical consequence, Logical conjunction, Epistemology, Logical analysis, Logical data model, Non-classical logic, Logical reasoning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Source of Logical Necessity — Research Paper | ScholarLens