2023Palgrave studies in comparative East-West philosophyOpen access

From Virtue Ethics to Virtue Epistemology

Michael Slote

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The field of philosophy went from a revival of virtue ethics that is said to have begun in 1958 to a revival of virtue epistemology that began (with a paper by Ernest Sosa) in 1980. The two forms of virtue theorizing have recently been pursued to a substantial extent independently of one another, and my purpose here is to try to convince you that contemporary virtue ethics has at least one lesson it can teach to contemporary virtue epistemology. There are new developments in virtue ethics that so far have no parallel in virtue epistemology, but I want to persuade you that parallel developments in the latter field might actually be useful in solving some problems, dealing with difficulties, that have faced at least one major approach to virtue epistemology: namely, the widely influential view known as responsibilism, which emphasizes epistemic virtues at the person level, that is, epistemic traits of character.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The field of philosophy went from a revival of virtue ethics that is said to have begun in 1958 to a revival of virtue epistemology that began (with a paper by Ernest Sosa) in 1980. The two forms of virtue theorizing have recently been pursued to a substantial extent independently of one another, and my purpose here is to try to convince you that contemporary virtue ethics has at least one lesson it can teach to contemporary virtue epistemology. There are new developments in virtue ethics that so far have no parallel in virtue epistemology, but I want to persuade you that parallel developments in the latter field might actually be useful in solving some problems, dealing with difficulties, that have faced at least one major approach to virtue epistemology: namely, the widely influential view known as responsibilism, which emphasizes epistemic virtues at the person level, that is, epistemic traits of character.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The field of philosophy went from a revival of virtue ethics that is said to have begun in 1958 to a revival of virtue epistemology that began (with a paper by Ernest Sosa) in 1980. The two forms of virtue theorizing have recently been pursued to a substantial extent independently of one another, and my purpose here is to try to convince you that contemporary virtue ethics has at least one lesson it can teach to contemporary virtue epistemology. There are new developments in virtue ethics that so far have no parallel in virtue epistemology, but I want to persuade you that parallel developments in the latter field might actually be useful in solving some problems, dealing with difficulties, that have faced at least one major approach to virtue epistemology: namely, the widely influential view known as responsibilism, which emphasizes epistemic virtues at the person level, that is, epistemic traits of character.

Key concepts: Virtue, Epistemic virtue, Epistemology, Virtue ethics, Philosophy, Character (mathematics), Mathematics, Geometry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From Virtue Ethics to Virtue Epistemology — Research Paper | ScholarLens