2023Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Multi-level governance

Alfredas Chmieliauskas, Ralf Müller, Раймонда Алондериене, Margarita Pilkienė, Saulius Šimkonis

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Existing governance theories for projects struggle to explain inter-organizational settings. They either address hierarchical or networked structures, but not both simultaneously. This chapter presents the multilevel governance (MLG) theory as a framework for theorizing project governance in complex inter-organizational settings. MLG, originally developed in political science, addresses governance theories’ heterogeneity and provides a theoretical perspective to integrate hierarchical, non-hierarchical, and network governance under one theoretical framework. MLG simultaneously applies two distinct governance perspectives: Type I governance, a vertical perspective, encompassing the hierarchical part of the project’s governance structure; and Type II governance, a horizontal perspective, encompassing the task-level governance in the project. This chapter defines the interface between Type I and II, which results in three organizational entities: clubs, agencies, and boards. A contingency framework for these entities is developed, explaining how they relate and under what circumstances each of these entities may occur. It allows practitioners to fine-tune their governance settings and academics to develop comprehensive project governance theories.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Existing governance theories for projects struggle to explain inter-organizational settings. They either address hierarchical or networked structures, but not both simultaneously. This chapter presents the multilevel governance (MLG) theory as a framework for theorizing project governance in complex inter-organizational settings. MLG, originally developed in political science, addresses governance theories’ heterogeneity and provides a theoretical perspective to integrate hierarchical, non-hierarchical, and network governance under one theoretical framework. MLG simultaneously applies two distinct governance perspectives: Type I governance, a vertical perspective, encompassing the hierarchical part of the project’s governance structure; and Type II governance, a horizontal perspective, encompassing the task-level governance in the project. This chapter defines the interface between Type I and II, which results in three organizational entities: clubs, agencies, and boards. A contingency framework for these entities is developed, explaining how they relate and under what circumstances each of these entities may occur. It allows practitioners to fine-tune their governance settings and academics to develop comprehensive project governance theories.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Existing governance theories for projects struggle to explain inter-organizational settings. They either address hierarchical or networked structures, but not both simultaneously. This chapter presents the multilevel governance (MLG) theory as a framework for theorizing project governance in complex inter-organizational settings. MLG, originally developed in political science, addresses governance theories’ heterogeneity and provides a theoretical perspective to integrate hierarchical, non-hierarchical, and network governance under one theoretical framework. MLG simultaneously applies two distinct governance perspectives: Type I governance, a vertical perspective, encompassing the hierarchical part of the project’s governance structure; and Type II governance, a horizontal perspective, encompassing the task-level governance in the project. This chapter defines the interface between Type I and II, which results in three organizational entities: clubs, agencies, and boards. A contingency framework for these entities is developed, explaining how they relate and under what circumstances each of these entities may occur. It allows practitioners to fine-tune their governance settings and academics to develop comprehensive project governance theories.

Key concepts: Project governance, Corporate governance, Multi-level governance, Contingency, Perspective (graphical), Information governance, Politics, Knowledge management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multi-level governance — Research Paper | ScholarLens