2023Surgical Neurology InternationalOpen access

Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: Complications after 292 procedures without neurophysiological monitoring

Alejandro Serrano Rubio, Héctor A. Rodríguez-Rubio, Rodrigo López-Rodríguez, Alfredo Bonilla-Suástegui, Fernando Piñón-Jiménez, Oscar Rubén Contreras-Vázquez, Rogelio Revuelta-Gutiérrez

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Background: Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is characterized by involuntary, progressive, and intermittent spasms in the upper and lower facial muscles. Due to the high success rate, microvascular decompression (MVD) is the treatment of choice, and intraoperative neuromonitoring (INM) is considered useful for achieving safe surgery. Still, most centers do not have this technology. Methods: We analyzed 294 patients with HFS treated with MVD without INM. We only included patients with a neurovascular etiology while excluding other causes, such as tumors. As part of the postoperative evaluation, we assessed preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and pure-tone audiometry. Results: The main complication was peripheral facial paralysis in 50 patients, followed by hypoacusis in 22 patients and deafness in 17 patients, associated with a failed surgical outcome (P = 0.0002). The anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) was an offending vessel, and the involvement of more than one vessel was significantly associated with the development of facial nerve palsy (P = 0.01). AICA was also associated with hearing impairment (P = 0.04). Over 90% of immediate complications improve in the follow-up (6 months), and one patient did not show a cure for initial HFS. Conclusion: MVD is the method with the highest long-term cure rates for treating HFS; however, we must inquire into the multiple factors of the patient and the surgeon to predict surgical outcomes. INM is not a must during MVD for HFS. We recommend its use depending on the availability and mainly on the surgeon’s skills, for surgeons.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is characterized by involuntary, progressive, and intermittent spasms in the upper and lower facial muscles. Due to the high success rate, microvascular decompression (MVD) is the treatment of choice, and intraoperative neuromonitoring (INM) is considered useful for achieving safe surgery. Still, most centers do not have this technology. Methods: We analyzed 294 patients with HFS treated with MVD without INM. We only included patients with a neurovascular etiology while excluding other causes, such as tumors. As part of the postoperative evaluation, we assessed preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and pure-tone audiometry. Results: The main complication was peripheral facial paralysis in 50 patients, followed by hypoacusis in 22 patients and deafness in 17 patients, associated with a failed surgical outcome (P = 0.0002). The anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) was an offending vessel, and the involvement of more than one vessel was significantly associated with the development of facial nerve palsy (P = 0.01). AICA was also associated with hearing impairment (P = 0.04). Over 90% of immediate complications improve in the follow-up (6 months), and one patient did not show a cure for initial HFS. Conclusion: MVD is the method with the highest long-term cure rates for treating HFS; however, we must inquire into the multiple factors of the patient and the surgeon to predict surgical outcomes. INM is not a must during MVD for HFS. We recommend its use depending on the availability and mainly on the surgeon’s skills, for surgeons.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is characterized by involuntary, progressive, and intermittent spasms in the upper and lower facial muscles. Due to the high success rate, microvascular decompression (MVD) is the treatment of choice, and intraoperative neuromonitoring (INM) is considered useful for achieving safe surgery. Still, most centers do not have this technology. Methods: We analyzed 294 patients with HFS treated with MVD without INM. We only included patients with a neurovascular etiology while excluding other causes, such as tumors. As part of the postoperative evaluation, we assessed preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and pure-tone audiometry. Results: The main complication was peripheral facial paralysis in 50 patients, followed by hypoacusis in 22 patients and deafness in 17 patients, associated with a failed surgical outcome (P = 0.0002). The anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) was an offending vessel, and the involvement of more than one vessel was significantly associated with the development of facial nerve palsy (P = 0.01). AICA was also associated with hearing impairment (P = 0.04). Over 90% of immediate complications improve in the follow-up (6 months), and one patient did not show a cure for initial HFS. Conclusion: MVD is the method with the highest long-term cure rates for treating HFS; however, we must inquire into the multiple factors of the patient and the surgeon to predict surgical outcomes. INM is not a must during MVD for HFS. We recommend its use depending on the availability and mainly on the surgeon’s skills, for surgeons.

Key concepts: Hemifacial spasm, Medicine, Microvascular decompression, Anterior inferior cerebellar artery, Neurovascular bundle, Palsy, Surgery, Facial nerve

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: Complications after 292 procedures without neurophysiological monitoring — Research Paper | ScholarLens