ScholarLens Back to search
2023•Legal Theory & Practice ReviewRequires access

Trends in court’s dicisions on religious freedom in the United States and South Korea

Jonghaeng Yoon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

#신앙의 자유, 이익형량의 원칙, 자기결정권, 양심적 병역 거부, 종교적 박해, freedom of religion, the least restrictive means rule, right to self-determination, conscientious objection to military service, religious persecution

About this research paper

What this paper is about

#신앙의 자유, 이익형량의 원칙, 자기결정권, 양심적 병역 거부, 종교적 박해, freedom of religion, the least restrictive means rule, right to self-determination, conscientious objection to military service, religious persecution

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

#신앙의 자유, 이익형량의 원칙, 자기결정권, 양심적 병역 거부, 종교적 박해, freedom of religion, the least restrictive means rule, right to self-determination, conscientious objection to military service, religious persecution

Key concepts: Persecution, Religious freedom, Freedom of religion, Conscientious objector, Law, Military service, Religious persecution, Political science

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Trends in court’s dicisions on religious freedom in the United States and South Korea — Research Paper | ScholarLens