2023•Advanced Functional MaterialsOpen access

Metal–Organic Framework Supercapacitors: Challenges and Opportunities

Seung‐Jae Shin, Jamie W. Gittins, Chloe J. Balhatchet, Aron Walsh, Alexander C. Forse

Open full text 252 citations

Abstract

Abstract Supercapacitors offer superior energy storage capabilities than traditional capacitors, making them useful for applications such as electric vehicles and rapid large‐scale energy storage. The energy storage performance of these devices relies on electrical double‐layer capacitance and/or pseudocapacitance from rapid reversible redox reactions. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have recently emerged as a new class of electrode materials with promising supercapacitor performances and capacitances that exceed those of traditional materials. However, the comparison of the supercapacitor performance of a porous carbon and a state‐of‐the‐art MOF highlights a number of challenges for MOF supercapacitors, including low potential windows, limited cycle lifetimes, and poor rate performances. It is proposed that the well‐defined and tuneable chemical structures of MOFs present a number of avenues for improving supercapacitor performance. Recent experimental and theoretical work on charging mechanisms in MOF‐based supercapacitors is also discussed, and it is found that there is a need for more studies that elucidate the charge storage and degradation mechanisms. Ultimately, a deeper understanding will lead to design principles for realizing improved supercapacitor energy storage devices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Supercapacitors offer superior energy storage capabilities than traditional capacitors, making them useful for applications such as electric vehicles and rapid large‐scale energy storage. The energy storage performance of these devices relies on electrical double‐layer capacitance and/or pseudocapacitance from rapid reversible redox reactions. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have recently emerged as a new class of electrode materials with promising supercapacitor performances and capacitances that exceed those of traditional materials. However, the comparison of the supercapacitor performance of a porous carbon and a state‐of‐the‐art MOF highlights a number of challenges for MOF supercapacitors, including low potential windows, limited cycle lifetimes, and poor rate performances. It is proposed that the well‐defined and tuneable chemical structures of MOFs present a number of avenues for improving supercapacitor performance. Recent experimental and theoretical work on charging mechanisms in MOF‐based supercapacitors is also discussed, and it is found that there is a need for more studies that elucidate the charge storage and degradation mechanisms. Ultimately, a deeper understanding will lead to design principles for realizing improved supercapacitor energy storage devices.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 252 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Supercapacitors offer superior energy storage capabilities than traditional capacitors, making them useful for applications such as electric vehicles and rapid large‐scale energy storage. The energy storage performance of these devices relies on electrical double‐layer capacitance and/or pseudocapacitance from rapid reversible redox reactions. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have recently emerged as a new class of electrode materials with promising supercapacitor performances and capacitances that exceed those of traditional materials. However, the comparison of the supercapacitor performance of a porous carbon and a state‐of‐the‐art MOF highlights a number of challenges for MOF supercapacitors, including low potential windows, limited cycle lifetimes, and poor rate performances. It is proposed that the well‐defined and tuneable chemical structures of MOFs present a number of avenues for improving supercapacitor performance. Recent experimental and theoretical work on charging mechanisms in MOF‐based supercapacitors is also discussed, and it is found that there is a need for more studies that elucidate the charge storage and degradation mechanisms. Ultimately, a deeper understanding will lead to design principles for realizing improved supercapacitor energy storage devices.

Key concepts: Supercapacitor, Pseudocapacitance, Energy storage, Materials science, Capacitance, Capacitor, Nanotechnology, Metal-organic framework

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Metal–Organic Framework Supercapacitors: Challenges and Opportunities — Research Paper | ScholarLens