2023Unpublished venueRequires access

Overall Contribution of Wingtip Devices to Improving Aircraft Performance

Nikola Gavrilović, Boško Rašuo, Vladimir Parezanović, George S. Dulikravich, Jean‐Marc Moschetta

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This chapter analyses and compares the impact on commercial aircraft performance of different types of classical winglets versus bio-inspired winglet configurations. The numerical methodology and results are presented and comparative results on the winglet aerodynamic performance are provided. To answer the question as to which is the best aerodynamic shape of the winglet, it is necessary to perform optimization for each of the previously analysed winglets, intending to obtain such a shape that provides the best performance of the aircraft. A bio-inspired winglet design is also compared with a classical winglet in a low-speed flow regime, typical for the operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The bio-inspired winglet has a significant advantage over the classical winglet in mitigating the UAV's wingtip vortex intensity, which is an essential consideration in optimizing the separation distances of both manned and unmanned aerial systems for air traffic management.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter analyses and compares the impact on commercial aircraft performance of different types of classical winglets versus bio-inspired winglet configurations. The numerical methodology and results are presented and comparative results on the winglet aerodynamic performance are provided. To answer the question as to which is the best aerodynamic shape of the winglet, it is necessary to perform optimization for each of the previously analysed winglets, intending to obtain such a shape that provides the best performance of the aircraft. A bio-inspired winglet design is also compared with a classical winglet in a low-speed flow regime, typical for the operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The bio-inspired winglet has a significant advantage over the classical winglet in mitigating the UAV's wingtip vortex intensity, which is an essential consideration in optimizing the separation distances of both manned and unmanned aerial systems for air traffic management.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter analyses and compares the impact on commercial aircraft performance of different types of classical winglets versus bio-inspired winglet configurations. The numerical methodology and results are presented and comparative results on the winglet aerodynamic performance are provided. To answer the question as to which is the best aerodynamic shape of the winglet, it is necessary to perform optimization for each of the previously analysed winglets, intending to obtain such a shape that provides the best performance of the aircraft. A bio-inspired winglet design is also compared with a classical winglet in a low-speed flow regime, typical for the operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The bio-inspired winglet has a significant advantage over the classical winglet in mitigating the UAV's wingtip vortex intensity, which is an essential consideration in optimizing the separation distances of both manned and unmanned aerial systems for air traffic management.

Key concepts: Wingtip device, Aerodynamics, Aerospace engineering, Computer science, Engineering, Simulation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Overall Contribution of Wingtip Devices to Improving Aircraft Performance — Research Paper | ScholarLens