Seismic Performance of Multistory Chevron‐braced Steel Structures with Yielding Beams
Ahmet Alperen Örgev, Serdar Selamet, Cüneyt Vatansever
Abstract
Ahmet Alperen Örgev, Serdar Selamet, Cüneyt Vatansever
Abstract
Abstract Lateral loads are resisted by braces in concentrically braced frames. Therefore, braces meet the demand for the load combination based on the seismic provisions. The rest of the system including the connections are determined according to the capacity‐based design, where the brace members yield under tension and buckle under compression. Chevron or inverted V‐braced frames are generally preferred because they allow large openings for doors and windows. However, the seismic‐design requirements in current building codes lead to deep, heavy chevron beams to resist the unbalanced load at beam members due to pre‐ and post‐buckling compressive strength deterioration and full tensile yielding of the braces. This results in uneconomical design. Recent large‐scale experiments of chevron‐braced frames have demonstrated that limited beam yielding is not detrimental to chevron‐braced frame behavior and on the contrary, it utilizes a second yielding mechanism and thereby increases the story drift capacity at which the braces fracture. Also, they propose a new design method for chevron braced frame with yielded beam. This paper expands the previous findings by investigating the seismic performance of 9‐story structures which are designed according to provisions and proposed method. Structural analysis program SAP2000 is utilized for linear design by modelling the full‐scale 9‐story building. Nonlinear finite element analysis software Perform 3D is utilized for the nonlinear time history analysis in which only a single chevron braced frame is modelled. Results show that the proposed building design has larger interstory drift ratios. However, the adjusted collapse margin ratio and the collapse probability for maximum considered earthquake satisfy the required limitations. In other words, the proposed chevron frame design offers a more economical alternative with no significant tradeoff in seismic performance.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Lateral loads are resisted by braces in concentrically braced frames. Therefore, braces meet the demand for the load combination based on the seismic provisions. The rest of the system including the connections are determined according to the capacity‐based design, where the brace members yield under tension and buckle under compression. Chevron or inverted V‐braced frames are generally preferred because they allow large openings for doors and windows. However, the seismic‐design requirements in current building codes lead to deep, heavy chevron beams to resist the unbalanced load at beam members due to pre‐ and post‐buckling compressive strength deterioration and full tensile yielding of the braces. This results in uneconomical design. Recent large‐scale experiments of chevron‐braced frames have demonstrated that limited beam yielding is not detrimental to chevron‐braced frame behavior and on the contrary, it utilizes a second yielding mechanism and thereby increases the story drift capacity at which the braces fracture. Also, they propose a new design method for chevron braced frame with yielded beam. This paper expands the previous findings by investigating the seismic performance of 9‐story structures which are designed according to provisions and proposed method. Structural analysis program SAP2000 is utilized for linear design by modelling the full‐scale 9‐story building. Nonlinear finite element analysis software Perform 3D is utilized for the nonlinear time history analysis in which only a single chevron braced frame is modelled. Results show that the proposed building design has larger interstory drift ratios. However, the adjusted collapse margin ratio and the collapse probability for maximum considered earthquake satisfy the required limitations. In other words, the proposed chevron frame design offers a more economical alternative with no significant tradeoff in seismic performance.
Key concepts: Chevron (anatomy), Structural engineering, Braced frame, Brace, Beam (structure), Buckling, Engineering, Bracing