2023•Journal of VisionOpen access

Attention modulates V4 neural activity across and in the absence of microsaccades

Shawn M. Willett, J. Patrick Mayo

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Recent work revealed that attention-related modulation of cortical and subcortical neuronal activity can depend on the presence and direction of microsaccades. In cortical area V4, attentional modulation is reported to occur only after a microsaccade is made towards an attended location (Lowet, et. al., 2018). On the other hand, attentional modulation in the subcortical superior colliculus (SC) occurs in the absence of microsaccades and when a microsaccade is made toward an attended target (but not away from a target; Yu et. al., 2022). This discrepancy may arise because of differences between SC and V4, task differences and/or task difficulty. We investigated population measures of attention in V4 around the time of microsaccades while monkeys performed a visual-spatial attention task. Monkeys detected an orientation-change in one of two simultaneously presented oriented Gabors. Monkeys fixated and reported an orientation change by saccading to the changed stimulus. Attention was cued to a stimulus location using a visual cue on instruction trials at the start of each block of trials. Cue validity varied across blocks with some blocks cued with an 80/20% cued/uncued regime, similar to work in SC, while others used a 50/50% regime. We recorded over 3500 V4 single- and multi-units from implanted Utah arrays. We compared the average population response aligned to microsaccade onset when monkeys attended a target within neural receptive fields versus when they attended a target outside of neural receptive fields. Contrary to previous reports in V4, we found that attention modulated V4 activity prior to and after microsaccades, regardless of microsaccade direction. We found this even when we shuffled across or averaged over microsaccade direction, indicating that attentional modulation of V4 is independent of microsaccades in this task. Our results suggest that certain task parameters may be key in determining how microsaccades interact with attention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recent work revealed that attention-related modulation of cortical and subcortical neuronal activity can depend on the presence and direction of microsaccades. In cortical area V4, attentional modulation is reported to occur only after a microsaccade is made towards an attended location (Lowet, et. al., 2018). On the other hand, attentional modulation in the subcortical superior colliculus (SC) occurs in the absence of microsaccades and when a microsaccade is made toward an attended target (but not away from a target; Yu et. al., 2022). This discrepancy may arise because of differences between SC and V4, task differences and/or task difficulty. We investigated population measures of attention in V4 around the time of microsaccades while monkeys performed a visual-spatial attention task. Monkeys detected an orientation-change in one of two simultaneously presented oriented Gabors. Monkeys fixated and reported an orientation change by saccading to the changed stimulus. Attention was cued to a stimulus location using a visual cue on instruction trials at the start of each block of trials. Cue validity varied across blocks with some blocks cued with an 80/20% cued/uncued regime, similar to work in SC, while others used a 50/50% regime. We recorded over 3500 V4 single- and multi-units from implanted Utah arrays. We compared the average population response aligned to microsaccade onset when monkeys attended a target within neural receptive fields versus when they attended a target outside of neural receptive fields. Contrary to previous reports in V4, we found that attention modulated V4 activity prior to and after microsaccades, regardless of microsaccade direction. We found this even when we shuffled across or averaged over microsaccade direction, indicating that attentional modulation of V4 is independent of microsaccades in this task. Our results suggest that certain task parameters may be key in determining how microsaccades interact with attention.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recent work revealed that attention-related modulation of cortical and subcortical neuronal activity can depend on the presence and direction of microsaccades. In cortical area V4, attentional modulation is reported to occur only after a microsaccade is made towards an attended location (Lowet, et. al., 2018). On the other hand, attentional modulation in the subcortical superior colliculus (SC) occurs in the absence of microsaccades and when a microsaccade is made toward an attended target (but not away from a target; Yu et. al., 2022). This discrepancy may arise because of differences between SC and V4, task differences and/or task difficulty. We investigated population measures of attention in V4 around the time of microsaccades while monkeys performed a visual-spatial attention task. Monkeys detected an orientation-change in one of two simultaneously presented oriented Gabors. Monkeys fixated and reported an orientation change by saccading to the changed stimulus. Attention was cued to a stimulus location using a visual cue on instruction trials at the start of each block of trials. Cue validity varied across blocks with some blocks cued with an 80/20% cued/uncued regime, similar to work in SC, while others used a 50/50% regime. We recorded over 3500 V4 single- and multi-units from implanted Utah arrays. We compared the average population response aligned to microsaccade onset when monkeys attended a target within neural receptive fields versus when they attended a target outside of neural receptive fields. Contrary to previous reports in V4, we found that attention modulated V4 activity prior to and after microsaccades, regardless of microsaccade direction. We found this even when we shuffled across or averaged over microsaccade direction, indicating that attentional modulation of V4 is independent of microsaccades in this task. Our results suggest that certain task parameters may be key in determining how microsaccades interact with attention.

Key concepts: Microsaccade, Cued speech, Stimulus (psychology), Receptive field, Psychology, Neuroscience, Population, Superior colliculus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Attention modulates V4 neural activity across and in the absence of microsaccades — Research Paper | ScholarLens