2023•Unpublished venueOpen access

Introducing the Reverse Gerrymandering Index: US House Elections 1872-2022

Bernard Tamas

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a new measure of gerrymandering, called the Reverse Gerrymandering Index (RGIx). Unlike the efficiency gap and partisan symmetry measures, which are influenced by vote variation across the entire state or country, the mainstay of RGIx is that it estimates the gerrymandering level of each district by comparing its partisan vote distribution with the partisan vote distribution of the districts adjacent to it. From there, RGIx can be used to identify highly gerrymandered districts, measure regional or historical variation in gerrymandering, or as a variable in statistical models, to name just a few applications. It can also calculate gerrymandering scores for an unlimited number of parties per district, making it applicable to comparative electoral systems research. I use RGIx to show that gerrymandering began rising rapidly in federal elections in the 1960s, and that it began to shift dramatically in a pro-Republican direction starting in the 1980s.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents a new measure of gerrymandering, called the Reverse Gerrymandering Index (RGIx). Unlike the efficiency gap and partisan symmetry measures, which are influenced by vote variation across the entire state or country, the mainstay of RGIx is that it estimates the gerrymandering level of each district by comparing its partisan vote distribution with the partisan vote distribution of the districts adjacent to it. From there, RGIx can be used to identify highly gerrymandered districts, measure regional or historical variation in gerrymandering, or as a variable in statistical models, to name just a few applications. It can also calculate gerrymandering scores for an unlimited number of parties per district, making it applicable to comparative electoral systems research. I use RGIx to show that gerrymandering began rising rapidly in federal elections in the 1960s, and that it began to shift dramatically in a pro-Republican direction starting in the 1980s.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents a new measure of gerrymandering, called the Reverse Gerrymandering Index (RGIx). Unlike the efficiency gap and partisan symmetry measures, which are influenced by vote variation across the entire state or country, the mainstay of RGIx is that it estimates the gerrymandering level of each district by comparing its partisan vote distribution with the partisan vote distribution of the districts adjacent to it. From there, RGIx can be used to identify highly gerrymandered districts, measure regional or historical variation in gerrymandering, or as a variable in statistical models, to name just a few applications. It can also calculate gerrymandering scores for an unlimited number of parties per district, making it applicable to comparative electoral systems research. I use RGIx to show that gerrymandering began rising rapidly in federal elections in the 1960s, and that it began to shift dramatically in a pro-Republican direction starting in the 1980s.

Key concepts: Gerrymandering, Distribution (mathematics), Political science, House of Representatives, Index (typography), Redistricting, Measure (data warehouse), Variation (astronomy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Introducing the Reverse Gerrymandering Index: US House Elections 1872-2022 — Research Paper | ScholarLens