2023MaterialsOpen access

Experimental Study on the Dilatancy and Energy Evolution Behaviors of Red-Bed Rocks under Unloading Conditions

Zhao‐Qiang Zheng, Huai-Zhong Liu, Li Zhuo, Ming-Li Xiao, Hongqiang Xie, Jiang‐Da He, Ming-Liang Peng

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

Surrounding rock deformation and consequent support failure are the most prominent issues in red-bed rock tunnel engineering and are mainly caused by the effects of unloading, rheology, and swelling. This study investigated the mechanical responses of two kinds of red-bed mudstone and sandstone under unloading conditions via laboratory observation. Volume dilation was observed on the rocks during unloading, and the dilatancy stress was linear with the initial confining pressure. However, the ratios of dilatancy stress to peak stress of the two rocks kept at a range from 0.8 to 0.9, regardless of confining pressures. Both the elastic strain energy and the dissipated energy evolved synchronously with the stress-strain curve and exhibited conspicuous confining pressure dependence. Special attention was paid to the evolution behavior of the dilatancy angle. The dilatancy angle changed linearly during unloading. When the confining pressure was 10 MPa, the dilatancy angle of mudstone decreased from 26.8° to 12.5° whereas the dilatancy angle of sandstone increased from 34.6° to 51.1°; when the confining pressure rose to 25 MPa, the dilatancy angle of mudstone and sandstone decreased from 45.8° to 17.4° and increased from 21.7° to 39.5°, respectively. To further understand the evolution of the dilatancy angle, we discussed the links between the variable dilatancy angle and the processes of rock deformation and energy dissipation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Surrounding rock deformation and consequent support failure are the most prominent issues in red-bed rock tunnel engineering and are mainly caused by the effects of unloading, rheology, and swelling. This study investigated the mechanical responses of two kinds of red-bed mudstone and sandstone under unloading conditions via laboratory observation. Volume dilation was observed on the rocks during unloading, and the dilatancy stress was linear with the initial confining pressure. However, the ratios of dilatancy stress to peak stress of the two rocks kept at a range from 0.8 to 0.9, regardless of confining pressures. Both the elastic strain energy and the dissipated energy evolved synchronously with the stress-strain curve and exhibited conspicuous confining pressure dependence. Special attention was paid to the evolution behavior of the dilatancy angle. The dilatancy angle changed linearly during unloading. When the confining pressure was 10 MPa, the dilatancy angle of mudstone decreased from 26.8° to 12.5° whereas the dilatancy angle of sandstone increased from 34.6° to 51.1°; when the confining pressure rose to 25 MPa, the dilatancy angle of mudstone and sandstone decreased from 45.8° to 17.4° and increased from 21.7° to 39.5°, respectively. To further understand the evolution of the dilatancy angle, we discussed the links between the variable dilatancy angle and the processes of rock deformation and energy dissipation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Surrounding rock deformation and consequent support failure are the most prominent issues in red-bed rock tunnel engineering and are mainly caused by the effects of unloading, rheology, and swelling. This study investigated the mechanical responses of two kinds of red-bed mudstone and sandstone under unloading conditions via laboratory observation. Volume dilation was observed on the rocks during unloading, and the dilatancy stress was linear with the initial confining pressure. However, the ratios of dilatancy stress to peak stress of the two rocks kept at a range from 0.8 to 0.9, regardless of confining pressures. Both the elastic strain energy and the dissipated energy evolved synchronously with the stress-strain curve and exhibited conspicuous confining pressure dependence. Special attention was paid to the evolution behavior of the dilatancy angle. The dilatancy angle changed linearly during unloading. When the confining pressure was 10 MPa, the dilatancy angle of mudstone decreased from 26.8° to 12.5° whereas the dilatancy angle of sandstone increased from 34.6° to 51.1°; when the confining pressure rose to 25 MPa, the dilatancy angle of mudstone and sandstone decreased from 45.8° to 17.4° and increased from 21.7° to 39.5°, respectively. To further understand the evolution of the dilatancy angle, we discussed the links between the variable dilatancy angle and the processes of rock deformation and energy dissipation.

Key concepts: Dilatant, Overburden pressure, Geotechnical engineering, Rheology, Geology, Deformation (meteorology), Dissipation, Red sandstone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experimental Study on the Dilatancy and Energy Evolution Behaviors of Red-Bed Rocks under Unloading Conditions — Research Paper | ScholarLens