2023Tsinghua Science & TechnologyOpen access

Malware Evasion Attacks Against IoT and Other Devices: An Empirical Study

Yan Xu, Deqiang Li, Qianmu Li, Shouhuai Xu

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) has grown rapidly due to artificial intelligence driven edge computing. While enabling many new functions, edge computing devices expand the vulnerability surface and have become the target of malware attacks. Moreover, attackers have used advanced techniques to evade defenses by transforming their malware into functionality-preserving variants. We systematically analyze such evasion attacks and conduct a large-scale empirical study in this paper to evaluate their impact on security. More specifically, we focus on two forms of evasion attacks: obfuscation and adversarial attacks. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to investigate and contrast the two families of evasion attacks systematically. We apply 10 obfuscation attacks and 9 adversarial attacks to 2870 malware examples. The obtained findings are as follows. (1) Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) malware detectors are vulnerable to evasion attacks. (2) Adversarial attacks affect COTS malware detectors slightly more effectively than obfuscated malware examples. (3) Code similarity detection approaches can be affected by obfuscated examples and are barely affected by adversarial attacks. (4) These attacks can preserve the functionality of original malware examples.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Internet of Things (IoT) has grown rapidly due to artificial intelligence driven edge computing. While enabling many new functions, edge computing devices expand the vulnerability surface and have become the target of malware attacks. Moreover, attackers have used advanced techniques to evade defenses by transforming their malware into functionality-preserving variants. We systematically analyze such evasion attacks and conduct a large-scale empirical study in this paper to evaluate their impact on security. More specifically, we focus on two forms of evasion attacks: obfuscation and adversarial attacks. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to investigate and contrast the two families of evasion attacks systematically. We apply 10 obfuscation attacks and 9 adversarial attacks to 2870 malware examples. The obtained findings are as follows. (1) Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) malware detectors are vulnerable to evasion attacks. (2) Adversarial attacks affect COTS malware detectors slightly more effectively than obfuscated malware examples. (3) Code similarity detection approaches can be affected by obfuscated examples and are barely affected by adversarial attacks. (4) These attacks can preserve the functionality of original malware examples.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) has grown rapidly due to artificial intelligence driven edge computing. While enabling many new functions, edge computing devices expand the vulnerability surface and have become the target of malware attacks. Moreover, attackers have used advanced techniques to evade defenses by transforming their malware into functionality-preserving variants. We systematically analyze such evasion attacks and conduct a large-scale empirical study in this paper to evaluate their impact on security. More specifically, we focus on two forms of evasion attacks: obfuscation and adversarial attacks. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to investigate and contrast the two families of evasion attacks systematically. We apply 10 obfuscation attacks and 9 adversarial attacks to 2870 malware examples. The obtained findings are as follows. (1) Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) malware detectors are vulnerable to evasion attacks. (2) Adversarial attacks affect COTS malware detectors slightly more effectively than obfuscated malware examples. (3) Code similarity detection approaches can be affected by obfuscated examples and are barely affected by adversarial attacks. (4) These attacks can preserve the functionality of original malware examples.

Key concepts: Evasion (ethics), Obfuscation, Malware, Computer security, Computer science, Cryptovirology, Vulnerability (computing), Adversarial system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Malware Evasion Attacks Against IoT and Other Devices: An Empirical Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens