2023International Business ReviewOpen access

Nonmarket strategy and legitimacy in institutionally voided environments: The case of Jumia, an African e-commerce giant

Augustine Awuah Peprah, Bede Akorige Atarah, Makafui Kwame Kumodzie‐Dussey

Open full text 39 citations

Abstract

This paper examines how a newly established multinational enterprise (MNE) leverages nonmarket strategy (NMS) to deal with legitimacy problems posed by institutional voids in institutionally challenging contexts to gain legitimacy. Using a rich dataset from in-depth interviews, observations, and archival data on Jumia, an African e-commerce giant, we identify three types of institutional void (i.e., infrastructural, regulatory and legal, and cognitive cultural voids) that hinder the implementation of the e-commerce business model. We further unpack the MNE's specific NMS to validate, consolidate, and diffuse the new business model to gain legitimacy accordingly. Importantly, we theorize how MNEs, under various conditions of unstable institutional structures and mechanisms, employ NMS to achieve three kinds of legitimacy in the process—i.e., cognitive, regulative and normative legitimacies. Altogether, we integrate three prominent streams of literature in IB—NMS, institutional voids, and legitimacy literature—to build a theory on how MNEs deploy NMS to establish legitimacy in response to environmental uncertainty to validate their activities and consolidate trust by gaining political and regulatory support.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper examines how a newly established multinational enterprise (MNE) leverages nonmarket strategy (NMS) to deal with legitimacy problems posed by institutional voids in institutionally challenging contexts to gain legitimacy. Using a rich dataset from in-depth interviews, observations, and archival data on Jumia, an African e-commerce giant, we identify three types of institutional void (i.e., infrastructural, regulatory and legal, and cognitive cultural voids) that hinder the implementation of the e-commerce business model. We further unpack the MNE's specific NMS to validate, consolidate, and diffuse the new business model to gain legitimacy accordingly. Importantly, we theorize how MNEs, under various conditions of unstable institutional structures and mechanisms, employ NMS to achieve three kinds of legitimacy in the process—i.e., cognitive, regulative and normative legitimacies. Altogether, we integrate three prominent streams of literature in IB—NMS, institutional voids, and legitimacy literature—to build a theory on how MNEs deploy NMS to establish legitimacy in response to environmental uncertainty to validate their activities and consolidate trust by gaining political and regulatory support.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper examines how a newly established multinational enterprise (MNE) leverages nonmarket strategy (NMS) to deal with legitimacy problems posed by institutional voids in institutionally challenging contexts to gain legitimacy. Using a rich dataset from in-depth interviews, observations, and archival data on Jumia, an African e-commerce giant, we identify three types of institutional void (i.e., infrastructural, regulatory and legal, and cognitive cultural voids) that hinder the implementation of the e-commerce business model. We further unpack the MNE's specific NMS to validate, consolidate, and diffuse the new business model to gain legitimacy accordingly. Importantly, we theorize how MNEs, under various conditions of unstable institutional structures and mechanisms, employ NMS to achieve three kinds of legitimacy in the process—i.e., cognitive, regulative and normative legitimacies. Altogether, we integrate three prominent streams of literature in IB—NMS, institutional voids, and legitimacy literature—to build a theory on how MNEs deploy NMS to establish legitimacy in response to environmental uncertainty to validate their activities and consolidate trust by gaining political and regulatory support.

Key concepts: Legitimacy, Nonmarket forces, Normative, Multinational corporation, Institutional theory, Business, Void (composites), Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nonmarket strategy and legitimacy in institutionally voided environments: The case of Jumia, an African e-commerce giant — Research Paper | ScholarLens