Conclusion
Boaventura de Sousa Santos
Abstract
Boaventura de Sousa Santos
Abstract
As mentioned in Chapter 1, in his Prison Notebooks Antonio Gramsci introduced the concept of the interregnum in contemporary politics (1972). Whereas in the Middle Ages the term referred to the period between the death or abdication of a king and the crowning of the next one, for Gramsci the interregnum was related to the period of transition between the old Italy and the new Italy. He famously described it thus: ‘The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear’ (1972: 276). We definitely live in an interregnum.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
As mentioned in Chapter 1, in his Prison Notebooks Antonio Gramsci introduced the concept of the interregnum in contemporary politics (1972). Whereas in the Middle Ages the term referred to the period between the death or abdication of a king and the crowning of the next one, for Gramsci the interregnum was related to the period of transition between the old Italy and the new Italy. He famously described it thus: ‘The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear’ (1972: 276). We definitely live in an interregnum.
Key concepts: Interregnum, Abdication, Politics, Prison, Period (music), History, Ancient history, Humanities