2023Open Access Research Journal of Life SciencesOpen access

A healthy environment as a fundamental human right and a natural environment from the perspective of anthropocentric, biocentric or ecocentric paradigms

Romário Teixeira Braga Filho

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The protection and conservation of a healthy environment is a fundamental human right and an obligation for everyone. The aggressions to the environment practiced by human beings have caused damage to different species of life, to human health and to the ecosystem as a whole. The ineffectiveness of many of the proposals for environmental protection is probably associated with the utilitarian view that human beings have regarding other living beings and the natural environment – a distorted view linked to the anthropocentric paradigm. Scholars have proposed the adoption of the biocentric paradigm - which considers that all non-human living beings have an intrinsic value independent of human expectations, or the ecocentric paradigm - which considers the interdependence between all living beings and the natural environment as fundamental for the survival of life on the planet. Through the methodology of integrative review, the author analyzes the concepts presented by scholars in studies on the environment, and the central paradigms in their discussions, which mostly point to the need for evolution towards the biocentric or ecocentric paradigms.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The protection and conservation of a healthy environment is a fundamental human right and an obligation for everyone. The aggressions to the environment practiced by human beings have caused damage to different species of life, to human health and to the ecosystem as a whole. The ineffectiveness of many of the proposals for environmental protection is probably associated with the utilitarian view that human beings have regarding other living beings and the natural environment – a distorted view linked to the anthropocentric paradigm. Scholars have proposed the adoption of the biocentric paradigm - which considers that all non-human living beings have an intrinsic value independent of human expectations, or the ecocentric paradigm - which considers the interdependence between all living beings and the natural environment as fundamental for the survival of life on the planet. Through the methodology of integrative review, the author analyzes the concepts presented by scholars in studies on the environment, and the central paradigms in their discussions, which mostly point to the need for evolution towards the biocentric or ecocentric paradigms.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The protection and conservation of a healthy environment is a fundamental human right and an obligation for everyone. The aggressions to the environment practiced by human beings have caused damage to different species of life, to human health and to the ecosystem as a whole. The ineffectiveness of many of the proposals for environmental protection is probably associated with the utilitarian view that human beings have regarding other living beings and the natural environment – a distorted view linked to the anthropocentric paradigm. Scholars have proposed the adoption of the biocentric paradigm - which considers that all non-human living beings have an intrinsic value independent of human expectations, or the ecocentric paradigm - which considers the interdependence between all living beings and the natural environment as fundamental for the survival of life on the planet. Through the methodology of integrative review, the author analyzes the concepts presented by scholars in studies on the environment, and the central paradigms in their discussions, which mostly point to the need for evolution towards the biocentric or ecocentric paradigms.

Key concepts: Anthropocentrism, Environmental ethics, Natural (archaeology), Obligation, Perspective (graphical), Sociology, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A healthy environment as a fundamental human right and a natural environment from the perspective of anthropocentric, biocentric or ecocentric paradigms — Research Paper | ScholarLens