STANDARDS FOR CONDUCTING AND INTERPRETING THE RESULTS OF URODYNAMIC STUDIES IN CHILDREN
С.С. Никитин, Н.Б. Гусева, R. O. Ignatiev
Abstract
С.С. Никитин, Н.Б. Гусева, R. O. Ignatiev
Abstract
Article represents a bibliographical review on the problem of standards for conducting urodynamic research methods. The need for urodynamic studies is quite high and is due to the high prevalence of urination disorders in children. At the same time, the Russia urodynamic laboratories count is low and they aren’t available in all Russia regions. Plus, the number of scientific publications on urodynamics and the pediatric neurology in general is clearly insufficient. Performance of urodynamic studies in adult patients is standardized by the ICS guidelines. At the same time not all of the guidelines are acceptable in children, it is therefore necessary to approach each clinical situation individually when choosing methods for urodynamic research. This review discusses methods of urodynamic studies, such as: uroflowmetry, uroflowmetry with simultaneous recording of pelvic floor electromyography, cystometry, pressure-flow study and urethral profilometry. A brief historical background is presented as well as the indications for the methods of urodynamic research, the research techniques and the peculiarities of the results interpretation. In addition, an example of a conclusion is shown when conducting a comprehensive urodynamic study in a pediatric patient. The article is aimed at standardizing the conduct, the interpretation of the results and the formulation of conclusions when conducting urodynamic studies in children.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Article represents a bibliographical review on the problem of standards for conducting urodynamic research methods. The need for urodynamic studies is quite high and is due to the high prevalence of urination disorders in children. At the same time, the Russia urodynamic laboratories count is low and they aren’t available in all Russia regions. Plus, the number of scientific publications on urodynamics and the pediatric neurology in general is clearly insufficient. Performance of urodynamic studies in adult patients is standardized by the ICS guidelines. At the same time not all of the guidelines are acceptable in children, it is therefore necessary to approach each clinical situation individually when choosing methods for urodynamic research. This review discusses methods of urodynamic studies, such as: uroflowmetry, uroflowmetry with simultaneous recording of pelvic floor electromyography, cystometry, pressure-flow study and urethral profilometry. A brief historical background is presented as well as the indications for the methods of urodynamic research, the research techniques and the peculiarities of the results interpretation. In addition, an example of a conclusion is shown when conducting a comprehensive urodynamic study in a pediatric patient. The article is aimed at standardizing the conduct, the interpretation of the results and the formulation of conclusions when conducting urodynamic studies in children.
Key concepts: Urodynamic studies, Cystometry, Medicine, Urination, Urodynamic testing, Urination disorder, Medical physics, Surgery