2023Earth and Planetary ScienceOpen access

Revisiting Recent Amplitude and Phase Variations of the Chandler Wobble and Free Core Nutation

Zinovy Malkin

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the analysis of two components of the Earth’s rotation, Chandler wobble (CW) and free core nutation (FCN). They are oscillations with near-constant periods but variable amplitude and phase. The variations of the amplitude and phase of the CW and FCN have already been considered in the literature, and both showed similar behavior such as a recent significant decrease of the amplitude and large phase change. However, the CW and FCN amplitude and phase variations are, to a large extent, predicted for the current epochs, and their today’s variations need regular updates with obtaining new observations. In this work, the CW and FCN parameters have been re-computed using the latest data and compared with the data published earlier. It was found that the currently obtained amplitude and phase variations generally agreed with the data published earlier. The main difference is that the epochs of the current minimum of amplitude and phase jump or both CW and FCN happened somewhat later than was predicted in previous publications. The delay is about two years for the CW relative to the prediction made in 2010 and about one year for the FCN with respect to the prediction made in 2022.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper is devoted to the analysis of two components of the Earth’s rotation, Chandler wobble (CW) and free core nutation (FCN). They are oscillations with near-constant periods but variable amplitude and phase. The variations of the amplitude and phase of the CW and FCN have already been considered in the literature, and both showed similar behavior such as a recent significant decrease of the amplitude and large phase change. However, the CW and FCN amplitude and phase variations are, to a large extent, predicted for the current epochs, and their today’s variations need regular updates with obtaining new observations. In this work, the CW and FCN parameters have been re-computed using the latest data and compared with the data published earlier. It was found that the currently obtained amplitude and phase variations generally agreed with the data published earlier. The main difference is that the epochs of the current minimum of amplitude and phase jump or both CW and FCN happened somewhat later than was predicted in previous publications. The delay is about two years for the CW relative to the prediction made in 2010 and about one year for the FCN with respect to the prediction made in 2022.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper is devoted to the analysis of two components of the Earth’s rotation, Chandler wobble (CW) and free core nutation (FCN). They are oscillations with near-constant periods but variable amplitude and phase. The variations of the amplitude and phase of the CW and FCN have already been considered in the literature, and both showed similar behavior such as a recent significant decrease of the amplitude and large phase change. However, the CW and FCN amplitude and phase variations are, to a large extent, predicted for the current epochs, and their today’s variations need regular updates with obtaining new observations. In this work, the CW and FCN parameters have been re-computed using the latest data and compared with the data published earlier. It was found that the currently obtained amplitude and phase variations generally agreed with the data published earlier. The main difference is that the epochs of the current minimum of amplitude and phase jump or both CW and FCN happened somewhat later than was predicted in previous publications. The delay is about two years for the CW relative to the prediction made in 2010 and about one year for the FCN with respect to the prediction made in 2022.

Key concepts: Nutation, Amplitude, Speed wobble, Phase (matter), Geodesy, Rotation (mathematics), Physics, Jump

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Revisiting Recent Amplitude and Phase Variations of the Chandler Wobble and Free Core Nutation — Research Paper | ScholarLens