2023•Unpublished venueRequires access

Performance Comparison of Open-Circuit Voltage Modelling of Li-ion Batteries at Different C-Rates

Prarthana Pillai, James H Nguyen, Balakumar Balasingam

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The characterization of a battery to estimate its capacity is a crucial step in open-circuit voltage modelling. The battery capacity estimation is essential to determine diagnostic details on the battery and in determining several other battery parameters. Past research has shown that a normalized open-circuit voltage characterization independent of temperature is also dependent on accurate capacity estimation. In most works, the normalized OCV characterization approaches were done at C/30 rates where the entire data collection took approximately 60 hours. The undesirably long data collection process motivated the need to determine the expected accuracy at lower C-rates in realistic conditions. However, little attention was paid in the literature to investigate capacity estimation error at various C-rates. Thus, in this paper, the battery capacity estimation is repeated at seven C-rates: C/2, C/4, C/8, C/16, C/32, C/64 and C/128, to compare their accuracy using data collected from a laboratory-based battery cycler. It was found that with a lower current rate, a maximum of 0.3 Ah error is observed in the charge capacity. An error of 0.16 Ah was observed for the discharge capacity at the lowest C-rate of C/2 A.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The characterization of a battery to estimate its capacity is a crucial step in open-circuit voltage modelling. The battery capacity estimation is essential to determine diagnostic details on the battery and in determining several other battery parameters. Past research has shown that a normalized open-circuit voltage characterization independent of temperature is also dependent on accurate capacity estimation. In most works, the normalized OCV characterization approaches were done at C/30 rates where the entire data collection took approximately 60 hours. The undesirably long data collection process motivated the need to determine the expected accuracy at lower C-rates in realistic conditions. However, little attention was paid in the literature to investigate capacity estimation error at various C-rates. Thus, in this paper, the battery capacity estimation is repeated at seven C-rates: C/2, C/4, C/8, C/16, C/32, C/64 and C/128, to compare their accuracy using data collected from a laboratory-based battery cycler. It was found that with a lower current rate, a maximum of 0.3 Ah error is observed in the charge capacity. An error of 0.16 Ah was observed for the discharge capacity at the lowest C-rate of C/2 A.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The characterization of a battery to estimate its capacity is a crucial step in open-circuit voltage modelling. The battery capacity estimation is essential to determine diagnostic details on the battery and in determining several other battery parameters. Past research has shown that a normalized open-circuit voltage characterization independent of temperature is also dependent on accurate capacity estimation. In most works, the normalized OCV characterization approaches were done at C/30 rates where the entire data collection took approximately 60 hours. The undesirably long data collection process motivated the need to determine the expected accuracy at lower C-rates in realistic conditions. However, little attention was paid in the literature to investigate capacity estimation error at various C-rates. Thus, in this paper, the battery capacity estimation is repeated at seven C-rates: C/2, C/4, C/8, C/16, C/32, C/64 and C/128, to compare their accuracy using data collected from a laboratory-based battery cycler. It was found that with a lower current rate, a maximum of 0.3 Ah error is observed in the charge capacity. An error of 0.16 Ah was observed for the discharge capacity at the lowest C-rate of C/2 A.

Key concepts: Battery (electricity), Open-circuit voltage, Voltage, Battery capacity, Process (computing), Characterization (materials science), Computer science, Reliability engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance Comparison of Open-Circuit Voltage Modelling of Li-ion Batteries at Different C-Rates — Research Paper | ScholarLens