2023Applied SciencesOpen access

A Comparative Study on Bioleaching Properties of Various Sulfide Minerals Using Acidiphilium cryptum

Kang-Hee Cho, Hyunsoo Kim, Chang‐Gu Lee, Seong‐Jik Park, Nag‐Choul Choi

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Bioleaching has been regarded as a green alternative to chemical leaching in metal extraction processes. In this study, the bioleaching properties of indigenous acidophilic bacteria for various sulfide minerals were compared and evaluated in terms of pH reduction and metal leaching. The primary minerals in the samples were sphalerite (ZnS) (SP), galena (PbS) (GN1 and GN2), pyrite (FeS2) (PY), and chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) (CCP), and an indigenous acidophilic bacterium, Acidiphilium cryptum (99.56%), was applied for bioleaching experiments. The metal extraction in bioleaching differed according to the mineral content. The leached metal concentration of Zn was higher than that of Pb for the SP sample with a high ZnS content, whereas the concentration of Pb was higher than that of Zn for the GN1 and GN2 samples with a high PbS content. Meanwhile, the leaching rate of Zn was faster than that of Pb for all samples. Corrosion action was observed on the surface of bacterial residues in SP and GN1 samples. These results show that the bioleaching mechanism based on sulfide minerals proceeds through indirect biological oxidation, chemical oxidation, and direct bacterial oxidation. The results of this study can provide basic research data for process optimization when employing bioleaching to extract valuable metals.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Bioleaching has been regarded as a green alternative to chemical leaching in metal extraction processes. In this study, the bioleaching properties of indigenous acidophilic bacteria for various sulfide minerals were compared and evaluated in terms of pH reduction and metal leaching. The primary minerals in the samples were sphalerite (ZnS) (SP), galena (PbS) (GN1 and GN2), pyrite (FeS2) (PY), and chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) (CCP), and an indigenous acidophilic bacterium, Acidiphilium cryptum (99.56%), was applied for bioleaching experiments. The metal extraction in bioleaching differed according to the mineral content. The leached metal concentration of Zn was higher than that of Pb for the SP sample with a high ZnS content, whereas the concentration of Pb was higher than that of Zn for the GN1 and GN2 samples with a high PbS content. Meanwhile, the leaching rate of Zn was faster than that of Pb for all samples. Corrosion action was observed on the surface of bacterial residues in SP and GN1 samples. These results show that the bioleaching mechanism based on sulfide minerals proceeds through indirect biological oxidation, chemical oxidation, and direct bacterial oxidation. The results of this study can provide basic research data for process optimization when employing bioleaching to extract valuable metals.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Bioleaching has been regarded as a green alternative to chemical leaching in metal extraction processes. In this study, the bioleaching properties of indigenous acidophilic bacteria for various sulfide minerals were compared and evaluated in terms of pH reduction and metal leaching. The primary minerals in the samples were sphalerite (ZnS) (SP), galena (PbS) (GN1 and GN2), pyrite (FeS2) (PY), and chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) (CCP), and an indigenous acidophilic bacterium, Acidiphilium cryptum (99.56%), was applied for bioleaching experiments. The metal extraction in bioleaching differed according to the mineral content. The leached metal concentration of Zn was higher than that of Pb for the SP sample with a high ZnS content, whereas the concentration of Pb was higher than that of Zn for the GN1 and GN2 samples with a high PbS content. Meanwhile, the leaching rate of Zn was faster than that of Pb for all samples. Corrosion action was observed on the surface of bacterial residues in SP and GN1 samples. These results show that the bioleaching mechanism based on sulfide minerals proceeds through indirect biological oxidation, chemical oxidation, and direct bacterial oxidation. The results of this study can provide basic research data for process optimization when employing bioleaching to extract valuable metals.

Key concepts: Bioleaching, Sphalerite, Sulfide minerals, Chemistry, Leaching (pedology), Gold extraction, Sulfide, Galena

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Study on Bioleaching Properties of Various Sulfide Minerals Using Acidiphilium cryptum — Research Paper | ScholarLens