The content of the illegality of the act that is criminated in art.233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. Hunting without proper authorization
Anastasia Boldescu
Abstract
Open-access reader
Anastasia Boldescu
Abstract
Open-access reader
In the present study, we try to find the answer to the following question: does any illegal hunting form the content of the prejudicial action provided in art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova? In addition, the analysis of the conditions, in the presence of which the action of hunting becomes illegal, is initiated. The role of the reference provision is identified in the process of interpreting art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. It is demonstrated that the illegality of hunting in the meaning of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova is not limited to the violation of the provisions of a law regulating hunting. It is also revealed that the illegality of hunting does not always imply the illegality of this act in the sense of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. Finally, all types of proper authorization in the meaning of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova are analyzed. The acts, that do not fall under the notion ,,appropriate authorization” in art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, are identified.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the present study, we try to find the answer to the following question: does any illegal hunting form the content of the prejudicial action provided in art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova? In addition, the analysis of the conditions, in the presence of which the action of hunting becomes illegal, is initiated. The role of the reference provision is identified in the process of interpreting art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. It is demonstrated that the illegality of hunting in the meaning of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova is not limited to the violation of the provisions of a law regulating hunting. It is also revealed that the illegality of hunting does not always imply the illegality of this act in the sense of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. Finally, all types of proper authorization in the meaning of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova are analyzed. The acts, that do not fall under the notion ,,appropriate authorization” in art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, are identified.
Key concepts: The Republic, Criminal code, Authorization, Meaning (existential), Code (set theory), Action (physics), Law, Criminal procedure