2023Studia Universitatis Moldaviae Seria Stiinte SocialeOpen access

The content of the illegality of the act that is criminated in art.233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. Hunting without proper authorization

Anastasia Boldescu

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

In the present study, we try to find the answer to the following question: does any illegal hunting form the content of the prejudicial action provided in art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova? In addition, the analysis of the conditions, in the presence of which the action of hunting becomes illegal, is initiated. The role of the reference provision is identified in the process of interpreting art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. It is demonstrated that the illegality of hunting in the meaning of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova is not limited to the violation of the provisions of a law regulating hunting. It is also revealed that the illegality of hunting does not always imply the illegality of this act in the sense of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. Finally, all types of proper authorization in the meaning of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova are analyzed. The acts, that do not fall under the notion ,,appropriate authorization” in art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, are identified.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the present study, we try to find the answer to the following question: does any illegal hunting form the content of the prejudicial action provided in art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova? In addition, the analysis of the conditions, in the presence of which the action of hunting becomes illegal, is initiated. The role of the reference provision is identified in the process of interpreting art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. It is demonstrated that the illegality of hunting in the meaning of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova is not limited to the violation of the provisions of a law regulating hunting. It is also revealed that the illegality of hunting does not always imply the illegality of this act in the sense of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. Finally, all types of proper authorization in the meaning of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova are analyzed. The acts, that do not fall under the notion ,,appropriate authorization” in art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, are identified.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the present study, we try to find the answer to the following question: does any illegal hunting form the content of the prejudicial action provided in art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova? In addition, the analysis of the conditions, in the presence of which the action of hunting becomes illegal, is initiated. The role of the reference provision is identified in the process of interpreting art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. It is demonstrated that the illegality of hunting in the meaning of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova is not limited to the violation of the provisions of a law regulating hunting. It is also revealed that the illegality of hunting does not always imply the illegality of this act in the sense of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. Finally, all types of proper authorization in the meaning of art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova are analyzed. The acts, that do not fall under the notion ,,appropriate authorization” in art. 233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, are identified.

Key concepts: The Republic, Criminal code, Authorization, Meaning (existential), Code (set theory), Action (physics), Law, Criminal procedure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The content of the illegality of the act that is criminated in art.233 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova. Hunting without proper authorization — Research Paper | ScholarLens