2011International Journal of Electrochemical ScienceOpen access

Synthesis and Electrochemical Characteristics of LiFePO4/C Cathode Materials from Different Precursors

Jian Gao, Jianjun Li, Xiangming He, Changyin Jiang, Chunrong Wan

Open full text 40 citations

Abstract

Synthetic conditions and electrochemical characters of electrode materials mainly depend on the precursor. LiFePO4/C cathode materials are synthesized by solid-state reaction, using α-Fe2O3, Fe3O4, FePO4 and NH4FePO4 as precursors, respectively. The influences of precursor on structure and electrochemical performance of LiFePO4/C are investigated. The composition, structure, morphology, and physicochemical properties of the LiFePO4/C products from each precursor are characterized in detail by XRD, SEM, BET and electrochemical performance measurements. LiFePO4/C obtained from FePO4 precursor has the excellent electrochemical performances. LiFePO4/C prepared from α-Fe2O3 or Fe3O4 precursor also have good electrochemical properties, and the cost is much low because of the cheap precursors. For NH4FePO4 precursor, LiFePO4/C is most easy to be synthesized because the ratio of Fe2+ to PO43- is 1:1 and the carbothermal reduction is not necessary.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Synthetic conditions and electrochemical characters of electrode materials mainly depend on the precursor. LiFePO4/C cathode materials are synthesized by solid-state reaction, using α-Fe2O3, Fe3O4, FePO4 and NH4FePO4 as precursors, respectively. The influences of precursor on structure and electrochemical performance of LiFePO4/C are investigated. The composition, structure, morphology, and physicochemical properties of the LiFePO4/C products from each precursor are characterized in detail by XRD, SEM, BET and electrochemical performance measurements. LiFePO4/C obtained from FePO4 precursor has the excellent electrochemical performances. LiFePO4/C prepared from α-Fe2O3 or Fe3O4 precursor also have good electrochemical properties, and the cost is much low because of the cheap precursors. For NH4FePO4 precursor, LiFePO4/C is most easy to be synthesized because the ratio of Fe2+ to PO43- is 1:1 and the carbothermal reduction is not necessary.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Synthetic conditions and electrochemical characters of electrode materials mainly depend on the precursor. LiFePO4/C cathode materials are synthesized by solid-state reaction, using α-Fe2O3, Fe3O4, FePO4 and NH4FePO4 as precursors, respectively. The influences of precursor on structure and electrochemical performance of LiFePO4/C are investigated. The composition, structure, morphology, and physicochemical properties of the LiFePO4/C products from each precursor are characterized in detail by XRD, SEM, BET and electrochemical performance measurements. LiFePO4/C obtained from FePO4 precursor has the excellent electrochemical performances. LiFePO4/C prepared from α-Fe2O3 or Fe3O4 precursor also have good electrochemical properties, and the cost is much low because of the cheap precursors. For NH4FePO4 precursor, LiFePO4/C is most easy to be synthesized because the ratio of Fe2+ to PO43- is 1:1 and the carbothermal reduction is not necessary.

Key concepts: Electrochemistry, Carbothermic reaction, Cathode, Materials science, Lithium iron phosphate, Electrode, Chemical engineering, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Synthesis and Electrochemical Characteristics of LiFePO4/C Cathode Materials from Different Precursors — Research Paper | ScholarLens