2023Japan Architectural ReviewOpen access

Comparison of social and spatial preferences that help prevent isolation and loneliness

Takayuki UCHIHIRA, Kazunori NAKAJIMA, Hidetoshi Yasueda

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study concerns the domain of community development and probes methods of preventing isolation and loneliness. In so doing, this fundamental investigation attempts to answer the research question, “Which types of remedies, social or spatial, are more effective in alleviating isolation and loneliness, and in which aspects are they useful?” The study purposed to essentially evidence a means of evaluating the effectiveness of such social and spatial prescriptions by inferring the associations between isolation/loneliness and social and spatial preferences. The present investigation adopted a method that holistically considered both loneliness and isolation and conducted a complex analysis of these states. It employed a stochastic choice model with discrete dependent variables to elucidate the relationship between isolation and loneliness and social and spatial prescriptions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This study concerns the domain of community development and probes methods of preventing isolation and loneliness. In so doing, this fundamental investigation attempts to answer the research question, “Which types of remedies, social or spatial, are more effective in alleviating isolation and loneliness, and in which aspects are they useful?” The study purposed to essentially evidence a means of evaluating the effectiveness of such social and spatial prescriptions by inferring the associations between isolation/loneliness and social and spatial preferences. The present investigation adopted a method that holistically considered both loneliness and isolation and conducted a complex analysis of these states. It employed a stochastic choice model with discrete dependent variables to elucidate the relationship between isolation and loneliness and social and spatial prescriptions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This study concerns the domain of community development and probes methods of preventing isolation and loneliness. In so doing, this fundamental investigation attempts to answer the research question, “Which types of remedies, social or spatial, are more effective in alleviating isolation and loneliness, and in which aspects are they useful?” The study purposed to essentially evidence a means of evaluating the effectiveness of such social and spatial prescriptions by inferring the associations between isolation/loneliness and social and spatial preferences. The present investigation adopted a method that holistically considered both loneliness and isolation and conducted a complex analysis of these states. It employed a stochastic choice model with discrete dependent variables to elucidate the relationship between isolation and loneliness and social and spatial prescriptions.

Key concepts: Loneliness, Social isolation, Isolation (microbiology), Medical prescription, Psychology, Social psychology, Medicine, Psychotherapist

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of social and spatial preferences that help prevent isolation and loneliness — Research Paper | ScholarLens