2023•DiabetesRequires access

873-P: Empagliflozin Compliance and Influencing Factors in Patients with Heart Failure and Diabetes

CARLOS A. ALVAREZ, Aaron Rode Perkins, Meredith Sigler, Hui Yang, Harjeet Caberwal, Ramin Ebrahimi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Treatment paradigms for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure (HF) has changed. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, such as empagliflozin, are now considered potential first line therapies. Compliance to empagliflozin and the factors that may influence compliance are unknown. Methods: We assessed compliance and associated factors in patients with DM and HF from Veterans Affairs national data from 2015-22. Compliance was calculated using proportion of days covered (PDC). Compliance to empagliflozin was defined as PDC > 80%. Patients who compliance could not be calculated were excluded. Generalized linear models were constructed to evaluate 1) demographic, 2) patient level, and 3) system level data. Results: Total 28,581 patients exposed to empagliflozin were included. Proportion of empagliflozin compliance was 66.2%. Table 1 displays the significant demographic, patient, and system level factors associated with poor empagliflozin compliance. Conclusions: There were demographic, patient, and system level factors that were associated with poor empagliflozin compliance. Disclosure C.A.Alvarez: Research Support; Boehringer Ingelheim Inc. A.Perkins: None. M.A.Sigler: None. H.Yang: None. H.Caberwal: Employee; Boehringer Ingelheim Inc. R.Ebrahimi: Consultant; Pfizer Inc., Speaker's Bureau; Novo Nordisk. Funding Boehringer Ingelheim

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Treatment paradigms for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure (HF) has changed. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, such as empagliflozin, are now considered potential first line therapies. Compliance to empagliflozin and the factors that may influence compliance are unknown. Methods: We assessed compliance and associated factors in patients with DM and HF from Veterans Affairs national data from 2015-22. Compliance was calculated using proportion of days covered (PDC). Compliance to empagliflozin was defined as PDC > 80%. Patients who compliance could not be calculated were excluded. Generalized linear models were constructed to evaluate 1) demographic, 2) patient level, and 3) system level data. Results: Total 28,581 patients exposed to empagliflozin were included. Proportion of empagliflozin compliance was 66.2%. Table 1 displays the significant demographic, patient, and system level factors associated with poor empagliflozin compliance. Conclusions: There were demographic, patient, and system level factors that were associated with poor empagliflozin compliance. Disclosure C.A.Alvarez: Research Support; Boehringer Ingelheim Inc. A.Perkins: None. M.A.Sigler: None. H.Yang: None. H.Caberwal: Employee; Boehringer Ingelheim Inc. R.Ebrahimi: Consultant; Pfizer Inc., Speaker's Bureau; Novo Nordisk. Funding Boehringer Ingelheim

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Treatment paradigms for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure (HF) has changed. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, such as empagliflozin, are now considered potential first line therapies. Compliance to empagliflozin and the factors that may influence compliance are unknown. Methods: We assessed compliance and associated factors in patients with DM and HF from Veterans Affairs national data from 2015-22. Compliance was calculated using proportion of days covered (PDC). Compliance to empagliflozin was defined as PDC > 80%. Patients who compliance could not be calculated were excluded. Generalized linear models were constructed to evaluate 1) demographic, 2) patient level, and 3) system level data. Results: Total 28,581 patients exposed to empagliflozin were included. Proportion of empagliflozin compliance was 66.2%. Table 1 displays the significant demographic, patient, and system level factors associated with poor empagliflozin compliance. Conclusions: There were demographic, patient, and system level factors that were associated with poor empagliflozin compliance. Disclosure C.A.Alvarez: Research Support; Boehringer Ingelheim Inc. A.Perkins: None. M.A.Sigler: None. H.Yang: None. H.Caberwal: Employee; Boehringer Ingelheim Inc. R.Ebrahimi: Consultant; Pfizer Inc., Speaker's Bureau; Novo Nordisk. Funding Boehringer Ingelheim

Key concepts: Empagliflozin, Medicine, Compliance (psychology), Diabetes mellitus, Internal medicine, Type 2 diabetes, Endocrinology, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
873-P: Empagliflozin Compliance and Influencing Factors in Patients with Heart Failure and Diabetes — Research Paper | ScholarLens