2023MineralsOpen access

Optimizing Semi-Airborne Electromagnetic Survey Design for Mineral Exploration

Saeed Nazari, Raphael Rochlitz, Thomas Günther

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

As semi-airborne mineral exploration has a limited budget, it is critical to design experimental procedures that generate data to maximize desired information. We investigated the effects of transmitter–receiver geometries for a variety of anomalies and semi-airborne layouts. Our simulations indicated that flight line spacing of 200 m and a point distance of 100 m provides the optimal trade-off between coverage and survey progress for various targets. Based on the target size and distance between the transmitter and the target, the transmitter length should be at least equal to the length of the target. However, where the distance between the transmitter and the target is more than 1 km, the transmitter length should be at least two or three times the target size. Of similar importance are the location and direction of the transmitter cables, which can have a significant impact on the result of inversion and should be parallel to the target strike. By using more than one transmitter, better results can be obtained. If the strike of the target is known, transmitters should be parallel to each other, and if not, it is better to use perpendicular transmitters. The results of this study showed that the optimal distance between transmitters is 3 km. Our simulations showed that it is even possible to recover targets just below the transmitter in corresponding areas of masked data.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As semi-airborne mineral exploration has a limited budget, it is critical to design experimental procedures that generate data to maximize desired information. We investigated the effects of transmitter–receiver geometries for a variety of anomalies and semi-airborne layouts. Our simulations indicated that flight line spacing of 200 m and a point distance of 100 m provides the optimal trade-off between coverage and survey progress for various targets. Based on the target size and distance between the transmitter and the target, the transmitter length should be at least equal to the length of the target. However, where the distance between the transmitter and the target is more than 1 km, the transmitter length should be at least two or three times the target size. Of similar importance are the location and direction of the transmitter cables, which can have a significant impact on the result of inversion and should be parallel to the target strike. By using more than one transmitter, better results can be obtained. If the strike of the target is known, transmitters should be parallel to each other, and if not, it is better to use perpendicular transmitters. The results of this study showed that the optimal distance between transmitters is 3 km. Our simulations showed that it is even possible to recover targets just below the transmitter in corresponding areas of masked data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As semi-airborne mineral exploration has a limited budget, it is critical to design experimental procedures that generate data to maximize desired information. We investigated the effects of transmitter–receiver geometries for a variety of anomalies and semi-airborne layouts. Our simulations indicated that flight line spacing of 200 m and a point distance of 100 m provides the optimal trade-off between coverage and survey progress for various targets. Based on the target size and distance between the transmitter and the target, the transmitter length should be at least equal to the length of the target. However, where the distance between the transmitter and the target is more than 1 km, the transmitter length should be at least two or three times the target size. Of similar importance are the location and direction of the transmitter cables, which can have a significant impact on the result of inversion and should be parallel to the target strike. By using more than one transmitter, better results can be obtained. If the strike of the target is known, transmitters should be parallel to each other, and if not, it is better to use perpendicular transmitters. The results of this study showed that the optimal distance between transmitters is 3 km. Our simulations showed that it is even possible to recover targets just below the transmitter in corresponding areas of masked data.

Key concepts: Transmitter, Computer science, Perpendicular, Geology, Acoustics, Telecommunications, Remote sensing, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Optimizing Semi-Airborne Electromagnetic Survey Design for Mineral Exploration — Research Paper | ScholarLens