2023The International Encyclopedia of EthicsRequires access

Free Will

Alfred R. Mele

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This entry provides an overview of various theories of free will. It links free will to ethics by way of a connection between free will and moral responsibility. Free will is conceptualized as the ability to act freely, making free action the more basic notion. The kind of free action at issue is earmarked to moral responsibility. Among the major topics discussed are compatibilist (including semicompatibilist) theories of free will and three kinds of libertarian theory of free will: agent‐causal, event‐causal, and noncausal. Grounds offered for rejecting these various theories are discussed, as is the question of whether we ever act freely. Other topics receiving significant attention include Frankfurt‐style thought experiments, the ability to do otherwise than one did, what it is for actions of ours to be up to us, kinds of agential control, the bearing of luck on control, and the Consequence Argument. Key terms are defined, including compatibilism, determinism, incompatibilism, indeterminism, and libertarianism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This entry provides an overview of various theories of free will. It links free will to ethics by way of a connection between free will and moral responsibility. Free will is conceptualized as the ability to act freely, making free action the more basic notion. The kind of free action at issue is earmarked to moral responsibility. Among the major topics discussed are compatibilist (including semicompatibilist) theories of free will and three kinds of libertarian theory of free will: agent‐causal, event‐causal, and noncausal. Grounds offered for rejecting these various theories are discussed, as is the question of whether we ever act freely. Other topics receiving significant attention include Frankfurt‐style thought experiments, the ability to do otherwise than one did, what it is for actions of ours to be up to us, kinds of agential control, the bearing of luck on control, and the Consequence Argument. Key terms are defined, including compatibilism, determinism, incompatibilism, indeterminism, and libertarianism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This entry provides an overview of various theories of free will. It links free will to ethics by way of a connection between free will and moral responsibility. Free will is conceptualized as the ability to act freely, making free action the more basic notion. The kind of free action at issue is earmarked to moral responsibility. Among the major topics discussed are compatibilist (including semicompatibilist) theories of free will and three kinds of libertarian theory of free will: agent‐causal, event‐causal, and noncausal. Grounds offered for rejecting these various theories are discussed, as is the question of whether we ever act freely. Other topics receiving significant attention include Frankfurt‐style thought experiments, the ability to do otherwise than one did, what it is for actions of ours to be up to us, kinds of agential control, the bearing of luck on control, and the Consequence Argument. Key terms are defined, including compatibilism, determinism, incompatibilism, indeterminism, and libertarianism.

Key concepts: Compatibilism, Incompatibilism, Free will, Indeterminism, Libertarianism, Determinism, Epistemology, Luck

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Free Will — Research Paper | ScholarLens