2023Biosafety and BiotechnologyOpen access

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF CULTURING CELLS AND VIRUSES ON THE NEW SEPLIFE® LX-MC-DEX1 MICROCARRIER WITH EXISTING MICROCARRIERS

Sh. S. Turyskeldі, Жанна Саметова, A.K. USEMBAY, Ye. A. Bulatov

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

microcarriers are small solid particles 90–350 µm in size, on the surface of which cells grow in the form of a monolayer. The two main properties of microcarriers are cell adhesion and high cell production. According to the results of a comparative study conducted on various parameters, it was determined that each microcarrier has its own advantages and disadvantages. In our study, the properties of SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 and Cytodex 3 microcarriers were compared. According to the results of the studies, it was found that SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1, containing an artificial substance, is not inferior to Cytodex 3 microcarrier widely used in production in all properties and ease of use. The main advantage of the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier is its cost effectiveness, i.e. it is 5 times cheaper than Cytodex 3. In this regard, the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier was found to be cost-effective.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

microcarriers are small solid particles 90–350 µm in size, on the surface of which cells grow in the form of a monolayer. The two main properties of microcarriers are cell adhesion and high cell production. According to the results of a comparative study conducted on various parameters, it was determined that each microcarrier has its own advantages and disadvantages. In our study, the properties of SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 and Cytodex 3 microcarriers were compared. According to the results of the studies, it was found that SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1, containing an artificial substance, is not inferior to Cytodex 3 microcarrier widely used in production in all properties and ease of use. The main advantage of the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier is its cost effectiveness, i.e. it is 5 times cheaper than Cytodex 3. In this regard, the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier was found to be cost-effective.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

microcarriers are small solid particles 90–350 µm in size, on the surface of which cells grow in the form of a monolayer. The two main properties of microcarriers are cell adhesion and high cell production. According to the results of a comparative study conducted on various parameters, it was determined that each microcarrier has its own advantages and disadvantages. In our study, the properties of SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 and Cytodex 3 microcarriers were compared. According to the results of the studies, it was found that SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1, containing an artificial substance, is not inferior to Cytodex 3 microcarrier widely used in production in all properties and ease of use. The main advantage of the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier is its cost effectiveness, i.e. it is 5 times cheaper than Cytodex 3. In this regard, the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier was found to be cost-effective.

Key concepts: Microcarrier, Chemistry, Cell, Materials science, Cell biology, Biology, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF CULTURING CELLS AND VIRUSES ON THE NEW SEPLIFE® LX-MC-DEX1 MICROCARRIER WITH EXISTING MICROCARRIERS — Research Paper | ScholarLens