2023Journal of Research in Childhood EducationOpen access

A Systematic Review of Curiosity and Wonder in Natural Science and Early Childhood Education Research

Anne‐Line Bjerknes, Terese Wilhelmsen, Emilie Elisabeth Foyn-Bruun

Open full text 48 citations

Abstract

Disagreement exists about how to best spark young children's motivation to learn natural science.Both curiosity and wonder are considered important motivational factors for learning during early childhood (0-8 years).This systematic literature review explores research about scientific curiosity and wonder in early childhood education and care published from 2010-2020.The review outlines the population of interest (participants in the study, age of children, study location), methodological trends, and how curiosity and/or wonder are included in the research.The search yielded 300 peer-reviewed articles, of which 33 were included for analysis based on eligibility criteria.The main results showed that: (a) the term "curiosity" was more commonly used than the term "wonder," (b) few studies elaborated on their understanding of the two terms beyond them being naturally present in children, and (c) curiosity and/or wonder were emphasized as means to learn natural science or considered as stimulated by it, although few studies discussed how children's curiosity and wonder can be observed and nurtured.With a better understanding of what defines the terms curiosity and wonder and how to foster these qualities in early childhood education and care, we can learn to better support children's intrinsic motivation for science learning.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Disagreement exists about how to best spark young children's motivation to learn natural science.Both curiosity and wonder are considered important motivational factors for learning during early childhood (0-8 years).This systematic literature review explores research about scientific curiosity and wonder in early childhood education and care published from 2010-2020.The review outlines the population of interest (participants in the study, age of children, study location), methodological trends, and how curiosity and/or wonder are included in the research.The search yielded 300 peer-reviewed articles, of which 33 were included for analysis based on eligibility criteria.The main results showed that: (a) the term "curiosity" was more commonly used than the term "wonder," (b) few studies elaborated on their understanding of the two terms beyond them being naturally present in children, and (c) curiosity and/or wonder were emphasized as means to learn natural science or considered as stimulated by it, although few studies discussed how children's curiosity and wonder can be observed and nurtured.With a better understanding of what defines the terms curiosity and wonder and how to foster these qualities in early childhood education and care, we can learn to better support children's intrinsic motivation for science learning.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Disagreement exists about how to best spark young children's motivation to learn natural science.Both curiosity and wonder are considered important motivational factors for learning during early childhood (0-8 years).This systematic literature review explores research about scientific curiosity and wonder in early childhood education and care published from 2010-2020.The review outlines the population of interest (participants in the study, age of children, study location), methodological trends, and how curiosity and/or wonder are included in the research.The search yielded 300 peer-reviewed articles, of which 33 were included for analysis based on eligibility criteria.The main results showed that: (a) the term "curiosity" was more commonly used than the term "wonder," (b) few studies elaborated on their understanding of the two terms beyond them being naturally present in children, and (c) curiosity and/or wonder were emphasized as means to learn natural science or considered as stimulated by it, although few studies discussed how children's curiosity and wonder can be observed and nurtured.With a better understanding of what defines the terms curiosity and wonder and how to foster these qualities in early childhood education and care, we can learn to better support children's intrinsic motivation for science learning.

Key concepts: Wonder, Curiosity, Psychology, Natural (archaeology), Social psychology, History, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Systematic Review of Curiosity and Wonder in Natural Science and Early Childhood Education Research — Research Paper | ScholarLens