2023Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Toward a Framework for Comparing Accountability Regimes in Healthcare

Karsten Vrangbæk, Haldor Byrkjeflot

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The debate on accountability within the public sector has been especially lively over the past decade. Significant progress has been made in developing conceptual frameworks and typologies for characterizing different features and functions of accountability. At the same time, however, there has been a lack of sector-specific adjustment of such frameworks. In this chapter we present a framework for analyzing accountability within healthcare. The chapter makes use of the concept of “accountability regime” to signify the combination of different accountability forms, directions, and functions in operation at any given point in time. We show that reforms can introduce new forms of accountability, change existing accountability relations, or change the relative importance of different accountability forms. They may also change the dominant direction and shift the balance between different functions of accountability. We further suggest that developments in accountability regimes are best analyzed with a combination of top-down and bottom-up perspectives and that there is a need to develop research strategies to support this aim.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The debate on accountability within the public sector has been especially lively over the past decade. Significant progress has been made in developing conceptual frameworks and typologies for characterizing different features and functions of accountability. At the same time, however, there has been a lack of sector-specific adjustment of such frameworks. In this chapter we present a framework for analyzing accountability within healthcare. The chapter makes use of the concept of “accountability regime” to signify the combination of different accountability forms, directions, and functions in operation at any given point in time. We show that reforms can introduce new forms of accountability, change existing accountability relations, or change the relative importance of different accountability forms. They may also change the dominant direction and shift the balance between different functions of accountability. We further suggest that developments in accountability regimes are best analyzed with a combination of top-down and bottom-up perspectives and that there is a need to develop research strategies to support this aim.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The debate on accountability within the public sector has been especially lively over the past decade. Significant progress has been made in developing conceptual frameworks and typologies for characterizing different features and functions of accountability. At the same time, however, there has been a lack of sector-specific adjustment of such frameworks. In this chapter we present a framework for analyzing accountability within healthcare. The chapter makes use of the concept of “accountability regime” to signify the combination of different accountability forms, directions, and functions in operation at any given point in time. We show that reforms can introduce new forms of accountability, change existing accountability relations, or change the relative importance of different accountability forms. They may also change the dominant direction and shift the balance between different functions of accountability. We further suggest that developments in accountability regimes are best analyzed with a combination of top-down and bottom-up perspectives and that there is a need to develop research strategies to support this aim.

Key concepts: Accountability, Health care, Business, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Toward a Framework for Comparing Accountability Regimes in Healthcare — Research Paper | ScholarLens