2023Research SquareOpen access

Vegetation significance of broadleaved woody phytoliths in the mid-subtropical zone of China

Lidan Liu, Hengyu Liu, Hongyan Liu

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract To evaluate the reliability of broadleaved phytoliths for distinguishing different forest types in the mid-subtropical zone of China, we analyzed the phytolith assemblages of 50 broadleaved woody plants and 31 surface soil samples from three forest vegetation types (evergreen broadleaved forest, evergreen/deciduous broadleaved mixed forest, deciduous broadleaved forest). The results showed that the phytolith production and phytolith morphology of different broadleaved woody plants were significantly different. Evergreen broadleaved and deciduous broadleaved woody plants could be clearly distinguished according to their phytolith assemblages, providing a reliable basis for reconstructing forest vegetation. Eight broadleaved woody phytolith morphotypes were identified in the surface soil of the different forest types, accounting for ~ 5% of total phytoliths, and the broadleaved woody phytolith assemblages in the surface soil under different forest types were also different. We propose a phytolith index (B/S, defined as the ratio of broadleaved woody phytoliths to Gramineae short-cell phytoliths) to semi-quantitatively distinguish different forest types. B/S values in the surface soils of the different forest types are as follows. Evergreen broadleaved forest: < 0.03; evergreen/deciduous broadleaved mixed forest: 0.03–0.04; deciduous broadleaved forest > 0.04. Overall, our results support the use of broadleaved woody phytoliths and their indices in the surface soil of the mid-subtropical zone of China to distinguish different forest types, and they provide a useful reference for phytolith-based forest vegetation reconstruction in this region.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract To evaluate the reliability of broadleaved phytoliths for distinguishing different forest types in the mid-subtropical zone of China, we analyzed the phytolith assemblages of 50 broadleaved woody plants and 31 surface soil samples from three forest vegetation types (evergreen broadleaved forest, evergreen/deciduous broadleaved mixed forest, deciduous broadleaved forest). The results showed that the phytolith production and phytolith morphology of different broadleaved woody plants were significantly different. Evergreen broadleaved and deciduous broadleaved woody plants could be clearly distinguished according to their phytolith assemblages, providing a reliable basis for reconstructing forest vegetation. Eight broadleaved woody phytolith morphotypes were identified in the surface soil of the different forest types, accounting for ~ 5% of total phytoliths, and the broadleaved woody phytolith assemblages in the surface soil under different forest types were also different. We propose a phytolith index (B/S, defined as the ratio of broadleaved woody phytoliths to Gramineae short-cell phytoliths) to semi-quantitatively distinguish different forest types. B/S values in the surface soils of the different forest types are as follows. Evergreen broadleaved forest: < 0.03; evergreen/deciduous broadleaved mixed forest: 0.03–0.04; deciduous broadleaved forest > 0.04. Overall, our results support the use of broadleaved woody phytoliths and their indices in the surface soil of the mid-subtropical zone of China to distinguish different forest types, and they provide a useful reference for phytolith-based forest vegetation reconstruction in this region.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract To evaluate the reliability of broadleaved phytoliths for distinguishing different forest types in the mid-subtropical zone of China, we analyzed the phytolith assemblages of 50 broadleaved woody plants and 31 surface soil samples from three forest vegetation types (evergreen broadleaved forest, evergreen/deciduous broadleaved mixed forest, deciduous broadleaved forest). The results showed that the phytolith production and phytolith morphology of different broadleaved woody plants were significantly different. Evergreen broadleaved and deciduous broadleaved woody plants could be clearly distinguished according to their phytolith assemblages, providing a reliable basis for reconstructing forest vegetation. Eight broadleaved woody phytolith morphotypes were identified in the surface soil of the different forest types, accounting for ~ 5% of total phytoliths, and the broadleaved woody phytolith assemblages in the surface soil under different forest types were also different. We propose a phytolith index (B/S, defined as the ratio of broadleaved woody phytoliths to Gramineae short-cell phytoliths) to semi-quantitatively distinguish different forest types. B/S values in the surface soils of the different forest types are as follows. Evergreen broadleaved forest: < 0.03; evergreen/deciduous broadleaved mixed forest: 0.03–0.04; deciduous broadleaved forest > 0.04. Overall, our results support the use of broadleaved woody phytoliths and their indices in the surface soil of the mid-subtropical zone of China to distinguish different forest types, and they provide a useful reference for phytolith-based forest vegetation reconstruction in this region.

Key concepts: Phytolith, Evergreen, Deciduous, Subtropics, Vegetation (pathology), Woody plant, Evergreen forest, Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vegetation significance of broadleaved woody phytoliths in the mid-subtropical zone of China — Research Paper | ScholarLens